Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons · 2013
Osteoblastic differentiation and mineralization ability of periosteum-derived cells compared with bone marrow and calvaria-derived cells.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rosales-Rocabado Juan Marcelo, Kaku Masaru, Kitami Megumi, Akiba Yosuke, Uoshima Katsumi
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Clinically, bone marrow stromal cells (BMCs) are the most common source of osteoprogenitor cells. Its harvest process, however, is invasive to patients. Previous reports have shown the potential advantages of using periosteum-derived cells (PDCs) as a source of cell-based transplant therapy. The objective of our study was to characterize the osteoblastic differentiation and mineralization ability of PDCs versus BMCs and osteoblasts (OBs).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: BMCs, OBs, and PDCs were isolated from 4-week-old male Wistar rats. To characterize the differentiation ability of the cells, MTS assay, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity staining, picrosirius red staining, and alizarin red staining were performed. Immunohistochemistry was performed on paraffin sections of calvarial periosteum to determine the presence of mesenchymal stem cells.
RESULTS: PDCs showed the greatest proliferation rate compared with BMCs and OBs. Matured collagenous matrix formation was observed in PDCs and BMCs. ALP-positive cells and in vitro mineralization were evident in all cell types analyzed; however, that of PDCs was not comparable to that of the OBs and BMCs. Immunohistochemistry revealed the presence of STRO-1-and CD105-positive cells in the cambium layer of the periosteum.
CONCLUSIONS: PDCs have remarkable proliferative ability, but contain only a small population of osteogenic cells compared with BMCs and OBs. Although cell activity can be affected by various factors, such as age, culture condition, additives, and so forth, PDCs are likely not the source of OBs, although they might provide matrices that indirectly aid in bone formation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: BMCs, OBs, and PDCs were isolated from 4-week-old male Wistar rats. To characterize the differentiation ability of the cells, MTS assay, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity staining, picrosirius red staining, and alizarin red staining were performed. Immunohistochemistry was performed on paraffin sections of calvarial periosteum to determine the presence of mesenchymal stem cells.
RESULTS: PDCs showed the greatest proliferation rate compared with BMCs and OBs. Matured collagenous matrix formation was observed in PDCs and BMCs. ALP-positive cells and in vitro mineralization were evident in all cell types analyzed; however, that of PDCs was not comparable to that of the OBs and BMCs. Immunohistochemistry revealed the presence of STRO-1-and CD105-positive cells in the cambium layer of the periosteum.
CONCLUSIONS: PDCs have remarkable proliferative ability, but contain only a small population of osteogenic cells compared with BMCs and OBs. Although cell activity can be affected by various factors, such as age, culture condition, additives, and so forth, PDCs are likely not the source of OBs, although they might provide matrices that indirectly aid in bone formation.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Alkaline PhosphataseAnimalsAnthraquinonesAntigens, CDAntigens, SurfaceAzo CompoundsBone Marrow CellsCalcification, PhysiologicCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCollagenColoring AgentsExtracellular MatrixMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsOsteoblastsOsteogenesisPeriosteumRatsRats, WistarReceptors, Cell SurfaceSkull