The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2022
Idiopathic Hirsutism and Metabolic Status: A Population-based Prospective Cohort Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mahmoudieh Leila, Amiri Mina, Rahmati Maryam, Habibi Moeini Ali Siamak, Sarvghadi Farzaneh, Azizi Fereidoun, Ramezani Tehrani Fahimeh
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: A limited number of studies have investigated the impact of idiopathic hirsutism (IH) on cardiometabolic parameters with contradictory and inconclusive results. This study aimed to explore the effect of IH on metabolic outcomes.
METHOD: In this population-based prospective study, 334 women with IH and 1226 women as healthy controls were selected from Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. The generalized estimation equations method was applied to investigate the secular longitudinal trends of metabolic indices, including fasting blood sugar (FBS), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), non-HDL, triglyceride (TG), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and waist circumference (WC) in both groups. Unadjusted and adjusted Cox regression models were applied to assess the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CIs for the association between IH and metabolic disorders. Potential confounding factors such as age, body mass index, smoking, physical activity, history of hypertension (HTN), and family history of diabetes were included in the adjusted model.
RESULTS: This study showed that compared with healthy controls, women with IH had lower SHBG and higher total testosterone (median [interquartile ratio; IQR]: 0.37 [0.16-0.70] vs 0.33 [0.14-0.58]; P = 0.01), free androgen index (median [IQR]: 0.85 [0.38-1.54] vs 0.54 [0.26-0.97]; P = 0.001), androstenedione (median [IQR]: 1.60 [1.00-2.25] vs 1.10 [0.90-1.70]; P = 0.001), and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (median [IQR]: 168.5 [91.1-227.8] vs 125.2 [66.3-181]; P = 0.001). Over time, mean changes of FBS, HDL-C, LDL-C, non-HDL-C, TG, SBP, DBP, and WC were not significantly different in women with IH, compared with healthy controls. According to the unadjusted Cox regression model, except for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (HR [95% CI]: 1.45 [1.00-2.11]) P = 0.05; there was no statistically significant difference in hazard of metabolic disorders (ie, HTN, pre-HTN, pre-T2DM, and metabolic syndrome) in IH, compared with healthy controls. Besides, the adjusted Cox regression model showed no significant differences in the hazard of these outcomes.
CONCLUSION: This study showed no significant difference in overtime mean changes of metabolic risk factors and cardiometabolic outcomes in women with IH, compared with the healthy control group, except marginally significant difference on T2DM, which disappeared after further adjustment for potential confounders. Accordingly, routine screening of women for these metabolic outcomes should not recommend.
METHOD: In this population-based prospective study, 334 women with IH and 1226 women as healthy controls were selected from Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. The generalized estimation equations method was applied to investigate the secular longitudinal trends of metabolic indices, including fasting blood sugar (FBS), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), non-HDL, triglyceride (TG), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and waist circumference (WC) in both groups. Unadjusted and adjusted Cox regression models were applied to assess the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CIs for the association between IH and metabolic disorders. Potential confounding factors such as age, body mass index, smoking, physical activity, history of hypertension (HTN), and family history of diabetes were included in the adjusted model.
RESULTS: This study showed that compared with healthy controls, women with IH had lower SHBG and higher total testosterone (median [interquartile ratio; IQR]: 0.37 [0.16-0.70] vs 0.33 [0.14-0.58]; P = 0.01), free androgen index (median [IQR]: 0.85 [0.38-1.54] vs 0.54 [0.26-0.97]; P = 0.001), androstenedione (median [IQR]: 1.60 [1.00-2.25] vs 1.10 [0.90-1.70]; P = 0.001), and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (median [IQR]: 168.5 [91.1-227.8] vs 125.2 [66.3-181]; P = 0.001). Over time, mean changes of FBS, HDL-C, LDL-C, non-HDL-C, TG, SBP, DBP, and WC were not significantly different in women with IH, compared with healthy controls. According to the unadjusted Cox regression model, except for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (HR [95% CI]: 1.45 [1.00-2.11]) P = 0.05; there was no statistically significant difference in hazard of metabolic disorders (ie, HTN, pre-HTN, pre-T2DM, and metabolic syndrome) in IH, compared with healthy controls. Besides, the adjusted Cox regression model showed no significant differences in the hazard of these outcomes.
CONCLUSION: This study showed no significant difference in overtime mean changes of metabolic risk factors and cardiometabolic outcomes in women with IH, compared with the healthy control group, except marginally significant difference on T2DM, which disappeared after further adjustment for potential confounders. Accordingly, routine screening of women for these metabolic outcomes should not recommend.