The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India · 2021
Diabetic Foot Care Knowledge and Practices in Rural North India: Insights for Preventive Podiatry.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Verma Madhur, Sharma Nikita, Rashi, Arora Varun, Bashar M A, Nath Bhola, Kalra Sanjay
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is one of the most dreaded complications of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). Preventive podiatry is most efficient way of minimising DFU. The main aim of the study was to assess the knowledge and foot care practices among patients living with T2DM concerning the DFU.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in a rural-area of Haryana, India between January to March 2019 amongst 416 people living with T2DM after using multistage random sampling. A pre-tested, structured survey instrument prepared from the recommendation of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons and the Diabetes UK was used after Hindi translation as per standard protocol. The knowledge and practices were classified as good, satisfactory and poor if the total score was between 8-11, 6-7 and <6.
RESULTS: 14.2% had a previous history of DFU. The prevalence of good, satisfactory and poor knowledge was 63.5%, 12.5% and 24.0%. Further, 46.7%, 32.7% and 20.6% respondents depicted good, satisfactory and poor practices regarding foot care. On multivariate binary logistic regression analysis, younger age group, higher education, Per capita family income in INR, Blood glucose levels, HbA1c Levels, physical activity and previous history of DFU emerged as significant predictors of good foot-care knowledge and practices.
CONCLUSION: There is an evident gap between foot-care knowledge and practices that should be addressed through comprehensive behaviour change strategies. Comprehensive risk-assessments for diabetes associated complications needs to be piloted at community level to assess the feasibility.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in a rural-area of Haryana, India between January to March 2019 amongst 416 people living with T2DM after using multistage random sampling. A pre-tested, structured survey instrument prepared from the recommendation of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons and the Diabetes UK was used after Hindi translation as per standard protocol. The knowledge and practices were classified as good, satisfactory and poor if the total score was between 8-11, 6-7 and <6.
RESULTS: 14.2% had a previous history of DFU. The prevalence of good, satisfactory and poor knowledge was 63.5%, 12.5% and 24.0%. Further, 46.7%, 32.7% and 20.6% respondents depicted good, satisfactory and poor practices regarding foot care. On multivariate binary logistic regression analysis, younger age group, higher education, Per capita family income in INR, Blood glucose levels, HbA1c Levels, physical activity and previous history of DFU emerged as significant predictors of good foot-care knowledge and practices.
CONCLUSION: There is an evident gap between foot-care knowledge and practices that should be addressed through comprehensive behaviour change strategies. Comprehensive risk-assessments for diabetes associated complications needs to be piloted at community level to assess the feasibility.