MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.04.015

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of minimally invasive gynecology · 2019

Association between Preoperative Adenomyosis Detection Rate during Pelvic Ultrasonography and the Specialty of the Reading Physician.

Tamhane Nupur, McDowell Megan, Oliva Mariana, Tanner Jean Paul, Hochberg Lauri, Baker Marisa, Imudia Anthony N, Mikhail Emad

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

OBJECTIVE

To compare the detection rate of adenomyosis when ultrasound is performed by a radiologist compared with a gynecologic expert sonologist.

DESIGN

A retrospective, single-center study.

SETTING

A university teaching hospital.

PATIENTS: All women above 18 years of age with a positive histopathology diagnosis of adenomyosis obtained in a hysterectomy specimen from October 1, 2011, to October 1, 2017, were screened for inclusion. Cases without a preoperative pelvic ultrasound report, those with coexisting premalignant/malignant conditions, and patients presenting to the clinic with symptoms other than abnormal uterine bleeding, dysmenorrhea, or abdominal pain were excluded. A total of 412 cases were included in the final analysis.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS

The preoperative ultrasound was performed by a radiologist in 241 patients (59%) and by an expert gynecologic sonologist in 171 patients (42%). Patients' age, body mass index, race, ethnicity, parity, and history of prior cesarean section were comparable between the 2 groups. The adenomyosis detection rate was significantly higher in the expert gynecologic sonologist group compared with radiologists (95 [56%] vs 29 [12%], p <.01). After controlling for patients' race, body mass index, prior cesarean sections, and presence of myomas using multivariable logistic regression, gynecologic expert sonologists were 7.8 times more likely to detect adenomyosis than radiologists (odds ratio = 7.84; 95% confidence interval, 4.58-13.44). Regardless of medical specialty, the presence of myomas significantly decreased the detection of adenomyosis compared with the absence of myomas (odds ratio = 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.39).

CONCLUSION

The detection rate of adenomyosis was significantly higher when ultrasound was performed by expert gynecologic sonologists compared with radiologists. The presence of myomas significantly decreased detection rates regardless of specialty. Ultrasound evaluation for detecting adenomyosis should be preferentially performed by gynecologic expert sonologists.

Для цитирования: Tamhane Nupur, McDowell Megan, Oliva Mariana, Tanner Jean Paul, Hochberg Lauri, Baker Marisa, Imudia Anthony N, Mikhail Emad. Association between Preoperative Adenomyosis Detection Rate during Pelvic Ultrasonography and the Specialty of the Reading Physician.. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.04.015.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.