MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1200/jco.2013.51.2129

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2013

Tumor mismatch repair immunohistochemistry and DNA MLH1 methylation testing of patients with endometrial cancer diagnosed at age younger than 60 years optimizes triage for population-level germline mismatch repair gene mutation testing.

Buchanan Daniel D, Tan Yen Y, Walsh Michael D, Clendenning Mark, Metcalf Alexander M, Ferguson Kaltin, Arnold Sven T, Thompson Bryony A, Lose Felicity A, Parsons Michael T, Walters Rhiannon J, Pearson Sally-Ann, Cummings Margaret, Oehler Martin K, Blomfield Penelope B, Quinn Michael A, Kirk Judy A, Stewart Colin J, Obermair Andreas, Young Joanne P, Webb Penelope M, Spurdle Amanda B

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Clinicopathologic data from a population-based endometrial cancer cohort, unselected for age or family history, were analyzed to determine the optimal scheme for identification of patients with germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Endometrial cancers from 702 patients recruited into the Australian National Endometrial Cancer Study (ANECS) were tested for MMR protein expression using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and for MLH1 gene promoter methylation in MLH1-deficient cases. MMR mutation testing was performed on germline DNA of patients with MMR-protein deficient tumors. Prediction of germline mutation status was compared for combinations of tumor characteristics, age at diagnosis, and various clinical criteria (Amsterdam, Bethesda, Society of Gynecologic Oncology, ANECS).

RESULTS

Tumor MMR-protein deficiency was detected in 170 (24%) of 702 cases. Germline testing of 158 MMR-deficient cases identified 22 truncating mutations (3% of all cases) and four unclassified variants. Tumor MLH1 methylation was detected in 99 (89%) of 111 cases demonstrating MLH1/PMS2 IHC loss; all were germline MLH1 mutation negative. A combination of MMR IHC plus MLH1 methylation testing in women younger than 60 years of age at diagnosis provided the highest positive predictive value for the identification of mutation carriers at 46% versus ≤ 41% for any other criteria considered.

CONCLUSION

Population-level identification of patients with MMR mutation-positive endometrial cancer is optimized by stepwise testing for tumor MMR IHC loss in patients younger than 60 years, tumor MLH1 methylation in individuals with MLH1 IHC loss, and germline mutations in patients exhibiting loss of MSH6, MSH2, or PMS2 or loss of MLH1/PMS2 with absence of MLH1 methylation.

Для цитирования: Buchanan Daniel D, Tan Yen Y, Walsh Michael D, Clendenning Mark, Metcalf Alexander M, Ferguson Kaltin, Arnold Sven T, Thompson Bryony A, Lose Felicity A, Parsons Michael T, Walters Rhiannon J, Pearson Sally-Ann, Cummings Margaret, Oehler Martin K, Blomfield Penelope B, Quinn Michael A, Kirk Judy A, Stewart Colin J, Obermair Andreas, Young Joanne P, Webb Penelope M, Spurdle Amanda B. Tumor mismatch repair immunohistochemistry and DNA MLH1 methylation testing of patients with endometrial cancer diagnosed at age younger than 60 years optimizes triage for population-level germline mismatch repair gene mutation testing.. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2013. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.51.2129.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.