Irish journal of medical science · 2022
Strontium-89 chloride delivery for painful bone metastases in patients with a history of prior irradiation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Saito Anneyuko I, Inoue Tatsuya, Kinoshita Makiko, Kosaka Takahiro, Mitsuhashi Taira
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Re-irradiation of a previously irradiated site must be done with careful consideration to minimize dose to organs at risk.
AIMS: To evaluate pain response and safety of Sr-89 administration for painful bone metastases after prior irradiation.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with Sr-89 injection for painful bone metastasis in a previously irradiated site. All patients were seen in follow-up at 1, 2, 3, and 4 months after injection and every 6 months thereafter. Pain control, toxicity, and pain progression-free survival were analyzed. Correlation of pain relapse with the following characteristics was analyzed: gender, age, primary tumor, tumor pathology, baseline performance status, and baseline verbal rating scale.
RESULTS: Among 25 patients analyzed (10 male, 15 female), median age was 68 (range, 50-81) years. Primary tumor sites included lung (n = 11), breast (n = 3), uterine cervix (n = 3), prostate (n = 3), and others (n = 5). Median follow-up was 25 (range, 1-76) months. Pain relief was observed in 24 patients (96.0%). One- and 2-year pain progression-free survival rates in these patients were 54.5% and 48.4%, respectively. Median time to pain progression was 5 (range, 2-16) months. Statistically significantly lower pain progression-free survival was observed in patients with osteolytic bone metastases (p < 0.01). No grade 3 or worse adverse events were observed.
CONCLUSION: Sr-89 injection showed pain relief in most of our patients with painful bone metastases in a previously irradiated site and caused no grade 3 or worse adverse events. Sr-89 is an option for patients with a painful bone metastasis in a previously irradiated site.
AIMS: To evaluate pain response and safety of Sr-89 administration for painful bone metastases after prior irradiation.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with Sr-89 injection for painful bone metastasis in a previously irradiated site. All patients were seen in follow-up at 1, 2, 3, and 4 months after injection and every 6 months thereafter. Pain control, toxicity, and pain progression-free survival were analyzed. Correlation of pain relapse with the following characteristics was analyzed: gender, age, primary tumor, tumor pathology, baseline performance status, and baseline verbal rating scale.
RESULTS: Among 25 patients analyzed (10 male, 15 female), median age was 68 (range, 50-81) years. Primary tumor sites included lung (n = 11), breast (n = 3), uterine cervix (n = 3), prostate (n = 3), and others (n = 5). Median follow-up was 25 (range, 1-76) months. Pain relief was observed in 24 patients (96.0%). One- and 2-year pain progression-free survival rates in these patients were 54.5% and 48.4%, respectively. Median time to pain progression was 5 (range, 2-16) months. Statistically significantly lower pain progression-free survival was observed in patients with osteolytic bone metastases (p < 0.01). No grade 3 or worse adverse events were observed.
CONCLUSION: Sr-89 injection showed pain relief in most of our patients with painful bone metastases in a previously irradiated site and caused no grade 3 or worse adverse events. Sr-89 is an option for patients with a painful bone metastasis in a previously irradiated site.