Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2017
Use of hormone replacement therapy after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Johansen Nora, Liavaag Astrid H, Iversen Ole-Erik, Dørum Anne, Braaten Tonje, Michelsen Trond M
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: After premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) to prevent ovarian cancer, the non-cancer-related morbidity and mortality may be increased if sex hormones are not replaced. Several guidelines recommend systemic hormone replacement therapy (HRT) to these women until the expected age of menopause. We aimed to study the use of HRT after RRSO.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Participants were 324 women after RRSO and 11 160 postmenopausal controls. A subsample of 950 controls had undergone bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO). All participants completed the same questionnaire regarding HRT use. We compared HRT use in the RRSO group with the BSO controls using logistic regression.
RESULTS: Among the women aged ≤52 years without a history of breast cancer, 51.7% of the RRSO group and 48.7% of the BSO controls reported current use of systemic HRT (odds ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.76). Among the HRT users, systemic estrogen was used by 35.1% and 58.7% in the RRSO and BSO control groups, respectively (p = 0.001). Among the women aged >52 years, 16.8% of the RRSO group and 38.4% of the BSO controls (p < 0.001) used systemic HRT.
CONCLUSIONS: Among the RRSO women and BSO controls ≤52 years old without a history of breast cancer, relatively few were current users. If there are no contraindications, these women would benefit from systemic HRT. Additionally, almost 40% of the BSO controls >52 years used systemic HRT. Doctors should be aware of this practice and prescribe systemic HRT when indicated.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Participants were 324 women after RRSO and 11 160 postmenopausal controls. A subsample of 950 controls had undergone bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO). All participants completed the same questionnaire regarding HRT use. We compared HRT use in the RRSO group with the BSO controls using logistic regression.
RESULTS: Among the women aged ≤52 years without a history of breast cancer, 51.7% of the RRSO group and 48.7% of the BSO controls reported current use of systemic HRT (odds ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.76). Among the HRT users, systemic estrogen was used by 35.1% and 58.7% in the RRSO and BSO control groups, respectively (p = 0.001). Among the women aged >52 years, 16.8% of the RRSO group and 38.4% of the BSO controls (p < 0.001) used systemic HRT.
CONCLUSIONS: Among the RRSO women and BSO controls ≤52 years old without a history of breast cancer, relatively few were current users. If there are no contraindications, these women would benefit from systemic HRT. Additionally, almost 40% of the BSO controls >52 years used systemic HRT. Doctors should be aware of this practice and prescribe systemic HRT when indicated.