MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.medcli.2009.10.030

Медицинская библиотека · Medicina clinica · 2009

[Prevalence of use of hormone replacement therapy in women participating in a breast cancer screening program].

Martínez-Pino Isabel, Puig Teresa, Quintana María Jesús, Solà Judit, Bonfill Xavier

Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to determine the prevalence and type of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in participants in a breast cancer screening program (BCSP) in Barcelona.

PATIENTS AND METHOD: Prevalence of use of HRT was obtained through a survey. Information about type of HRT, gynecological history and socioeconomic and educational level was collected. Prevalence was calculated with its corresponding 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

From May 2001 to June 2005 there were 21835 participants in the BCSP with a mean age of 57,6 years. Most of the participants were postmenopausal (86,7%). Confirmed prevalence of use of HRT was 5,2%(CI95% 5,3-6,0) with a greater use among women aged 55 to 59 years. The most frequent types of HRT were tibolone (39,5%) followed by combined estrogens plus progestin (30,4%). Higher education was associated with a higher use of HRT. Neither the use or the type of HRT influenced the results of the screening program.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of use of HRT was 5,2% in this study. The most frequently used agents were tibolone and combined estrogens plus progestin.

Для цитирования: Martínez-Pino Isabel, Puig Teresa, Quintana María Jesús, Solà Judit, Bonfill Xavier. [Prevalence of use of hormone replacement therapy in women participating in a breast cancer screening program].. Medicina clinica. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2009.10.030.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.