Cytopathology : official journal of the British Society for Clinical Cytology · 2009
Evaluation of aspiration cytology of ovarian masses with histopathological correlation.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sood T, Handa U, Mohan H, Goel P
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in distinguishing non-neoplastic and neoplastic ovarian lesions and to determine reliable cytological criteria for typing neoplastic ovarian masses into benign and malignant tumours and their subtypes.
METHODS: FNAC was performed on 50 patients diagnosed as having an ovarian mass clinically and/or ultrasonographically. Detailed history, clinical examination and ultrasound findings in each case were recorded. The cytological diagnoses were categorized as neoplastic and non-neoplastic and further into benign and malignant neoplasms. These cytological diagnoses were then compared subsequently with the histopathological diagnoses.
RESULTS: The study material consisted of 57 aspirates from 50 patients. A comparison of cytological findings with the histological diagnosis was possible in 53 aspirates; in the remaining four cases (7%) the smears were acellular. On cytology, 31 lesions were diagnosed as neoplastic and 22 as non-neoplastic. The overall sensitivity of cytology in diagnosing neoplastic and non-neoplastic ovarian lesions was 93.9% and the specificity was 100%. The positive predictive value was 100% and negative predictive value 90.9%. The overall diagnostic accuracy was 96.2 %.
CONCLUSION: FNAC of ovarian masses is a minimally invasive procedure that can differentiate neoplastic from non-neoplastic ovarian lesions. It may help avoid unnecessary operations and preserve the reproductive ability in young patients. Furthermore, it also enables a satisfactory sub-categorization of ovarian tumours, which facilitates the choice of appropriate therapy.
METHODS: FNAC was performed on 50 patients diagnosed as having an ovarian mass clinically and/or ultrasonographically. Detailed history, clinical examination and ultrasound findings in each case were recorded. The cytological diagnoses were categorized as neoplastic and non-neoplastic and further into benign and malignant neoplasms. These cytological diagnoses were then compared subsequently with the histopathological diagnoses.
RESULTS: The study material consisted of 57 aspirates from 50 patients. A comparison of cytological findings with the histological diagnosis was possible in 53 aspirates; in the remaining four cases (7%) the smears were acellular. On cytology, 31 lesions were diagnosed as neoplastic and 22 as non-neoplastic. The overall sensitivity of cytology in diagnosing neoplastic and non-neoplastic ovarian lesions was 93.9% and the specificity was 100%. The positive predictive value was 100% and negative predictive value 90.9%. The overall diagnostic accuracy was 96.2 %.
CONCLUSION: FNAC of ovarian masses is a minimally invasive procedure that can differentiate neoplastic from non-neoplastic ovarian lesions. It may help avoid unnecessary operations and preserve the reproductive ability in young patients. Furthermore, it also enables a satisfactory sub-categorization of ovarian tumours, which facilitates the choice of appropriate therapy.