Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2000
Qualitative analysis of value judgments in interpreting cervicovaginal smears using the Bethesda system.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Workman L, Schwartz M R, McCullough L B
Аннотация
CONTEXT: We hypothesize that there are unrecognized value judgments that influence cytopathologists in interpreting borderline cervicovaginal smears and that these judgments contribute to the well-documented variation among cytopathologists regarding such diagnoses.
OBJECTIVE: To identify and map these values.
DESIGN: Survey consisting of Kodachromes and histories for 5 borderline smears. Respondents were asked to give their diagnoses, recommendations for treatment, and reasoning.
RESULTS: We demonstrated a wide variation in interpretation of borderline smears similar to previous studies. We then used inductive qualitative analysis to identify the clinical reasoning and value judgments that influenced the responses.
CONCLUSIONS: We mapped those diagnostic value judgments that should be used in evaluation borderline cases. We believe this map can be used to rigorously manage and standardize the use of such judgments.
OBJECTIVE: To identify and map these values.
DESIGN: Survey consisting of Kodachromes and histories for 5 borderline smears. Respondents were asked to give their diagnoses, recommendations for treatment, and reasoning.
RESULTS: We demonstrated a wide variation in interpretation of borderline smears similar to previous studies. We then used inductive qualitative analysis to identify the clinical reasoning and value judgments that influenced the responses.
CONCLUSIONS: We mapped those diagnostic value judgments that should be used in evaluation borderline cases. We believe this map can be used to rigorously manage and standardize the use of such judgments.