Urology · 2010
Natural history of renal cortical neoplasms during active surveillance with follow-up longer than 5 years.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Haramis Georgios, Mues Adam C, Rosales Juan Carlos, Okhunov Zhamshid, Lanzac Alberto Perez, Badani Ketan, Gupta Mantu, Benson Mitchell C, McKiernan James, Landman Jaime
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To present our experience with patients who elected active surveillance for renal cortical neoplasms (RCNs) with ≥5 years of follow-up. Few data are available regarding the long-term natural history of RCNs during surveillance.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our urologic oncology database and identified 44 patients with 51 RCNs who had received active surveillance for >5 years of follow-up. The patient and tumor characteristics and tumor growth rate and overall survival data were evaluated.
RESULTS: The median patient age was 71.7 years (range 55-92), with 32 patients (72.7%) having a Charlson comorbidity index of ≥2. The median tumor size was 2.67 cm (range 0.9-8.6) at diagnosis. Biopsy was performed in 17 patients (38.6%). Of these 17 patients, clear cell renal cell carcinoma was diagnosed in 15 and papillary renal cell carcinoma in 2 patients. The median follow-up was 77.1 months (range 60-137), and the median growth rate was 0.15 cm/y. Of these patients, 2 (4.5%) required delayed intervention. One underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy because of a high tumor growth rate, and one elected to withdraw from active surveillance because of personal anxiety, despite having a stable tumor size for 72 months. The latter patient underwent laparoscopic renal cryoablation. Histopathologic examination revealed clear cell renal cell carcinoma in both cases. No metastases or cancer-related deaths occurred in our cohort; 1 patient died of cardiovascular disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Most RCNs undergoing surveillance for >5 years grew slowly. The metastatic potential appeared minimal in patients who demonstrated low or absent tumor growth for a long period.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our urologic oncology database and identified 44 patients with 51 RCNs who had received active surveillance for >5 years of follow-up. The patient and tumor characteristics and tumor growth rate and overall survival data were evaluated.
RESULTS: The median patient age was 71.7 years (range 55-92), with 32 patients (72.7%) having a Charlson comorbidity index of ≥2. The median tumor size was 2.67 cm (range 0.9-8.6) at diagnosis. Biopsy was performed in 17 patients (38.6%). Of these 17 patients, clear cell renal cell carcinoma was diagnosed in 15 and papillary renal cell carcinoma in 2 patients. The median follow-up was 77.1 months (range 60-137), and the median growth rate was 0.15 cm/y. Of these patients, 2 (4.5%) required delayed intervention. One underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy because of a high tumor growth rate, and one elected to withdraw from active surveillance because of personal anxiety, despite having a stable tumor size for 72 months. The latter patient underwent laparoscopic renal cryoablation. Histopathologic examination revealed clear cell renal cell carcinoma in both cases. No metastases or cancer-related deaths occurred in our cohort; 1 patient died of cardiovascular disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Most RCNs undergoing surveillance for >5 years grew slowly. The metastatic potential appeared minimal in patients who demonstrated low or absent tumor growth for a long period.