European urology · 2009
The AdVance transobturator male sling for postprostatectomy incontinence: clinical results of a prospective evaluation after a minimum follow-up of 6 months.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cornu Jean-Nicolas, Sèbe Philippe, Ciofu Calin, Peyrat Laurence, Beley Sébastien, Tligui Mohammed, Lukacs Bertrand, Traxer Olivier, Cussenot Olivier, Haab Francois
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Transobturator male slings have been proposed to manage stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after prostatic surgery, but data are still lacking.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and prospectively evaluate the clinical outcome after management of SUI after prostatic surgery by placement of a transobturator male sling.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a prospective evaluation on 102 patients treated in a single center between 2007 and 2009 for mild to moderate SUI following prostatic surgery.
INTERVENTIONS: Placement of a suburethral transobturator sling and clinical follow-up.
MEASUREMENTS: Patients were evaluated by medical history, preoperative urodynamics, maximum flow rate measurement, 24-h pad test, and daily pad use. During follow-up, data on patients' pad use, complications, and answers to the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire were collected. Cure was defined as no pad usage or one pad for security reasons and improvement as reduction of pads≥50%. Median follow-up was 13 mo (range: 6-26).
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Most patients (95%) presented post-radical prostatectomy incontinence (PRPI). Hospital stay was 2 d in 97 cases, and all patients were catheterized for 24h except two (48 h). Of 102 patients, 64 were cured, 18 were improved, and 20 were not improved. According to the PGI-I questionnaire, 85%, 11%, and 4% of patients described a respectively better, unchanged, and worse urinary tract condition, respectively. Previous radiation was associated with higher rate of failure (p=0.039). Neither severe complication nor postoperative urinary obstruction was noted during follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Placement of a transobturator sling is a safe and effective procedure, giving durable results after >1 yr of follow-up. Further evaluation and high-quality controlled, randomized studies are needed to assess long-term efficacy and precise indications of this procedure for post-prostatic-surgery SUI management.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and prospectively evaluate the clinical outcome after management of SUI after prostatic surgery by placement of a transobturator male sling.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a prospective evaluation on 102 patients treated in a single center between 2007 and 2009 for mild to moderate SUI following prostatic surgery.
INTERVENTIONS: Placement of a suburethral transobturator sling and clinical follow-up.
MEASUREMENTS: Patients were evaluated by medical history, preoperative urodynamics, maximum flow rate measurement, 24-h pad test, and daily pad use. During follow-up, data on patients' pad use, complications, and answers to the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire were collected. Cure was defined as no pad usage or one pad for security reasons and improvement as reduction of pads≥50%. Median follow-up was 13 mo (range: 6-26).
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Most patients (95%) presented post-radical prostatectomy incontinence (PRPI). Hospital stay was 2 d in 97 cases, and all patients were catheterized for 24h except two (48 h). Of 102 patients, 64 were cured, 18 were improved, and 20 were not improved. According to the PGI-I questionnaire, 85%, 11%, and 4% of patients described a respectively better, unchanged, and worse urinary tract condition, respectively. Previous radiation was associated with higher rate of failure (p=0.039). Neither severe complication nor postoperative urinary obstruction was noted during follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Placement of a transobturator sling is a safe and effective procedure, giving durable results after >1 yr of follow-up. Further evaluation and high-quality controlled, randomized studies are needed to assess long-term efficacy and precise indications of this procedure for post-prostatic-surgery SUI management.