The Journal of urology · 2000
Clinical usefulness of the novel marker BLCA-4 for the detection of bladder cancer.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Konety B R, Nguyen T S, Brenes G, Sholder A, Lewis N, Bastacky S, Potter D M, Getzenberg R H
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Previous studies at our laboratory identified 6 bladder cancer specific nuclear matrix proteins termed BLCA-1 to 6. We recently developed an immunoassay that detects the bladder cancer specific nuclear matrix protein BLCA-4. We analyzed urine samples from patients with bladder cancer, those with spinal cord injury and normal volunteers to determine the BLCA-4 level in these 3 groups.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urine samples obtained from 51 normal controls, and 54 patients with bladder cancer and 202 with spinal cord injury were tested for BLCA-4. We evaluated the association of BLCA-4 level with tumor grade and stage, urine cytology and bladder cancer history in the nonspinal cord injured population. Similarly we compared parameters associated with BLCA-4, such as spinal cord injury duration, catheterization, history of urinary tract infection, smoking and urine culture, in spinal cord injured patients.
RESULTS: We established a normal cutoff point of 13 optical density units per microg. protein for the BLCA-4 assay. The BLCA-4 level was less than the cutoff in all 51 normal controls, while in 53 of the 55 urine samples (96.4%) of patients with bladder cancer and 38 of the 202 (19%) of spinal cord injured patients urinary BLCA-4 was greater than the cutoff. There was no correlation of any individual factors studied in these cases, including urinary tract infection and urinary BLCA-4.
CONCLUSIONS: Elevated urinary BLCA-4 levels may accurately identify bladder cancer and distinguish these patients from normal individuals. There is no correlation of urinary BLCA-4 with a history of urinary tract infection, smoking, catheterization or cystitis considered independently. Urinary BLCA-4 determination appears to have high potential as a test for screening and monitoring bladder cancer in the general population and in groups at high risk for the disease, such as those with spinal cord injury.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urine samples obtained from 51 normal controls, and 54 patients with bladder cancer and 202 with spinal cord injury were tested for BLCA-4. We evaluated the association of BLCA-4 level with tumor grade and stage, urine cytology and bladder cancer history in the nonspinal cord injured population. Similarly we compared parameters associated with BLCA-4, such as spinal cord injury duration, catheterization, history of urinary tract infection, smoking and urine culture, in spinal cord injured patients.
RESULTS: We established a normal cutoff point of 13 optical density units per microg. protein for the BLCA-4 assay. The BLCA-4 level was less than the cutoff in all 51 normal controls, while in 53 of the 55 urine samples (96.4%) of patients with bladder cancer and 38 of the 202 (19%) of spinal cord injured patients urinary BLCA-4 was greater than the cutoff. There was no correlation of any individual factors studied in these cases, including urinary tract infection and urinary BLCA-4.
CONCLUSIONS: Elevated urinary BLCA-4 levels may accurately identify bladder cancer and distinguish these patients from normal individuals. There is no correlation of urinary BLCA-4 with a history of urinary tract infection, smoking, catheterization or cystitis considered independently. Urinary BLCA-4 determination appears to have high potential as a test for screening and monitoring bladder cancer in the general population and in groups at high risk for the disease, such as those with spinal cord injury.