MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00726-005-0185-x

Медицинская библиотека · Amino acids · 2005

Repeated-testing of place preference expression for evaluation of anti-craving-drug effects.

Herzig V, Schmidt W J

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

In addiction research, the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm is a widely used animal model of conditioned reward. Usually, CPP development is studied, while only few studies examine CPP expression. In the present study, the suitability of a schedule allowing repeated testing of CPP expression was evaluated. Two groups of rats were either conditioned with cocaine or morphine then the repeated-testing-schedule was applied. This schedule consisted of four repeated applications of a sequence of drug- (i.e. cocaine or morphine), saline- and anti-craving-drug- (i.e. acamprosate, naloxone, their joint administration or saline as internal control) tests. Methodologically, the repeated-testing-schedule produced stable CPP expression in both groups over 12 subsequent tests. In conclusion, it is suggested as a useful method to study effects of anti-craving-drugs on CPP expression, thereby reducing the overall number of experimental animals. The evaluation of the anti-craving-drug effects revealed that neither acamprosate and naloxone given separately nor their combined administration significantly reduced cocaine- or morphine-CPP expression. Thus, we suggest that these anti-craving-drugs are unlikely to be effective for relapse prevention in cocaine- or morphine-addicts.

Для цитирования: Herzig V, Schmidt W J. Repeated-testing of place preference expression for evaluation of anti-craving-drug effects.. Amino acids. 2005. DOI: 10.1007/s00726-005-0185-x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.