MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jpha.2013.12.006

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2014

Risk evaluation of impurities in topical excipients: The acetol case.

Boonen Jente, Veryser Lieselotte, Taevernier Lien, Roche Nathalie, Peremans Kathelijne, Burvenich Christian, De Spiegeleer Bart

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Pharmaceutical excipients for topical use may contain impurities, which are often neglected from a toxicity qualification viewpoint. The possible impurities in the most frequently used topical excipients were evaluated in-silico for their toxicity hazard. Acetol, an impurity likely present in different topical pharmaceutical excipients such as propylene glycol and glycerol, was withheld for the evaluation of its health risk after dermal exposure. An ex-vivo in-vitro permeation study using human skin in a Franz Diffusion Cell set-up and GC as quantification methodology showed a significant skin penetration with an overall Kp value of 1.82×10-3 cm/h. Using these data, limit specifications after application of a dermal pharmaceutical product were estimated. Based on the TTC approach of Cramer class I substances, i.e. 1800 µg/(day∙person), the toxicity-qualified specification limits of acetol in topical excipients were calculated to be 90 µg/mL and 180 µg/mL for propylene glycol and glycerol, respectively. It is concluded that setting specification limits for impurities within a quality-by-design approach requires a case-by-case evaluation as demonstrated here with acetol.

Для цитирования: Boonen Jente, Veryser Lieselotte, Taevernier Lien, Roche Nathalie, Peremans Kathelijne, Burvenich Christian, De Spiegeleer Bart. Risk evaluation of impurities in topical excipients: The acetol case.. Journal of pharmaceutical analysis. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpha.2013.12.006.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.