Molecular Landscape of Advanced Endometrial Cancer: Exploratory Analyses at Modena Cancer Center (MEMO).
Аннотация
Despite the introduction of novel therapeutic options, the prognosis of advanced endometrial cancer remains poor. In recent years, increasing attention has been directed toward the molecular characterization of endometrial cancer. However, data specifically focusing on advanced-stage disease are still limited. In our single-center, retrospective, exploratory study with a limited sample size, we analyzed 32 patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer treated at the Modena Cancer Center. Comprehensive molecular profiling was performed to assess DNA mutations, copy number variations, and RNA expression. We characterized the molecular landscape of this cohort, evaluated selected genomic alterations across predefined clinical subgroups, and explored their association with overall survival. Consistent with previous reports, a high prevalence of PTEN and PIK3CA mutations were observed. Patients experiencing relapse more than six months after diagnosis were more likely to harbor CTNNB1 mutations. KRAS mutations were more frequently detected in younger patients and in those with endometrioid histology, whereas PPP2R1A and TP53 mutations were enriched in tumors with non-endometrioid histology. Notably, CTNNB1 mutations were associated with a favorable prognostic impact, while KRAS mutations correlated with poorer overall survival. Our findings underscore the need for further investigation into the molecular landscape of advanced endometrial cancer, particularly in the context of therapeutic implications. Combinatorial treatment strategies targeting specific molecular alterations, such as KRAS, in combination with other targeted agents or therapeutic approaches, warrant further exploration.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.