MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/13668250.2012.685149

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of intellectual & developmental disability · 2012

Relationship between prior legal involvement and current crisis for adults with intellectual disability.

Lunsky Yona, Raina Poonam, Jones Jessica

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Individuals with intellectual disability (ID) and legal involvement are a unique population with complex needs. To date, there has been limited research exploring the demographic and clinical profiles of individuals with ID and legal involvement that are in crisis and how they differ to individuals with ID without legal involvement.

METHOD: 130 adults with ID and a history of legal involvement were compared to 617 without legal involvement who had experienced at least one crisis in terms of crisis presentation and outcome.

RESULTS

Overall, those with a known history of legal involvement were younger, higher functioning and more likely to be male and living in unsupported settings. Legal history was not a significant predictor of crisis involving aggression but was a significant predictor of police response to crisis, when other variables were controlled for.

CONCLUSIONS

Adults with ID and legal history may be more likely to have police respond to their crises than other individuals. Understanding the unique profiles of those with legal history can inform the development of services targeted towards offenders with ID.

Для цитирования: Lunsky Yona, Raina Poonam, Jones Jessica. Relationship between prior legal involvement and current crisis for adults with intellectual disability.. Journal of intellectual & developmental disability. 2012. DOI: 10.3109/13668250.2012.685149.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.