The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025
In vitro activity of contezolid and other comparators against clinical Staphylococcus and Enterococcus: a multicenter study in China.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lu Rongqi, Li Xue, Yang Wenhang, Chen Jiawei, Zhang Ge, Li Jin, Zhang Jingjia, Wang Tong, Kang Wei, Gao Haotian, Xu Yingchun, Liu Yali
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the in vitro activity of contezolid against clinical Staphylococcus and Enterococcus isolates from across China, and compare its performance with linezolid and other key agents.
METHODS: A total of 2510 non-duplicate Gram-positive cocci isolates were collected from 70 hospitals in seven Chinese regions. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using broth microdilution (BMD) per CLSI guidelines. MIC50/90 values, susceptibility rates, cumulative MIC curves and MIC distribution agreement between contezolid and linezolid were assessed. Linezolid-resistant isolates and contezolid-resistant isolates-defined as those based on CLSI 2025 linezolid breakpoints-underwent whole-genome sequencing and comprehensive screening for known oxazolidinone resistance determinants, including acquired resistance genes, 23S rRNA mutations and amino acid substitutions in ribosomal proteins L3, L4 and L22.
RESULTS: Contezolid exhibited potent in vitro activity, with >99% of isolates inhibited at ≤4 mg/L and showed lower MIC50/90 than linezolid, with a consistently left-shifted cumulative MIC distribution. Cohen's kappa analysis supporting enhanced activity of contezolid. Notably, we report for the first time clinical isolates with contezolid MICs up to 16 mg/L. Whole-genome analysis of 14 linezolid-resistant isolates (including five resistant to contezolid) revealed universal presence of optrA, cfr, fexA and other resistance genes, alongside domain V 23S rRNA mutations and substitutions in ribosomal proteins L3 and L4, supporting a shared genetic basis and potential cross-resistance between the two agents.
CONCLUSIONS: Contezolid demonstrated potent and consistent activity against drug-resistant Gram-positive cocci, supporting its potential as a therapeutic alternative to linezolid. Further studies are needed to confirm resistance mechanisms and clinical utility.
METHODS: A total of 2510 non-duplicate Gram-positive cocci isolates were collected from 70 hospitals in seven Chinese regions. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using broth microdilution (BMD) per CLSI guidelines. MIC50/90 values, susceptibility rates, cumulative MIC curves and MIC distribution agreement between contezolid and linezolid were assessed. Linezolid-resistant isolates and contezolid-resistant isolates-defined as those based on CLSI 2025 linezolid breakpoints-underwent whole-genome sequencing and comprehensive screening for known oxazolidinone resistance determinants, including acquired resistance genes, 23S rRNA mutations and amino acid substitutions in ribosomal proteins L3, L4 and L22.
RESULTS: Contezolid exhibited potent in vitro activity, with >99% of isolates inhibited at ≤4 mg/L and showed lower MIC50/90 than linezolid, with a consistently left-shifted cumulative MIC distribution. Cohen's kappa analysis supporting enhanced activity of contezolid. Notably, we report for the first time clinical isolates with contezolid MICs up to 16 mg/L. Whole-genome analysis of 14 linezolid-resistant isolates (including five resistant to contezolid) revealed universal presence of optrA, cfr, fexA and other resistance genes, alongside domain V 23S rRNA mutations and substitutions in ribosomal proteins L3 and L4, supporting a shared genetic basis and potential cross-resistance between the two agents.
CONCLUSIONS: Contezolid demonstrated potent and consistent activity against drug-resistant Gram-positive cocci, supporting its potential as a therapeutic alternative to linezolid. Further studies are needed to confirm resistance mechanisms and clinical utility.