Molecular biology reports · 2025
Environmental antibiotic stress and high-risk resistance genes in bacterial communities of the Gomti and Ganga Rivers, India.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Naznine Fahmi, Aafreen Ushba, Malik Yashpal Singh, Ansari Mohd Ikram
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The river ecosystems provide habitats and source of water for a number of species including humans. The uncontrolled accumulation of pollutants in the aquatic environment enhances the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and genes.
METHODS: Water samples were collected seasonally from different sites of Gomti and Ganga River. Bacteria were isolated by plating on nutrient agar supplemented with individual antibiotics (100 µg/ml) to select the resistant strains. These isolates were subsequently tested for cross-resistance to other antibiotics using the disc diffusion method. PCR was performed to detect selected ARGs.
RESULTS: The enumeration of microbial population of Gomti River, the tetracycline-resistant bacteria comprised 38% of the bacterial population during spring and chloramphenicol resistance during autumn was a mere 11.9%. Nevertheless, erythromycin resistance was widespread amongst Ganga river bacteria during winter by 28%, while ciprofloxacin resistance was seen in autumn with only 15.8%. Bacterial population led to decline due to antibiotic-induced stress. The tetracycline-resistant bacteria were completely resistant to ampicillin and 66.6% were resistant to erythromycin. In Ganga river water, 53.5% of ampicillin-resistant isolates were resistant to erythromycin and sulphadiazine 93.3% were resistant to nalidixic acid. In the Gomti River water, the most common resistance gene among tetracycline resistant isolates was tetM (83.3%), followed by ampC (83.3%) in ampicillin-resistant isolates. In the Ganga River, 66.6% of bacterial isolates were found to have ampC and ermB genes. The sul1 gene was absent in all the bacterial isolates in both water samples.
CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that both rivers act as reservoirs for multidrug-resistant bacteria harbouring complex resistance gene profiles.
METHODS: Water samples were collected seasonally from different sites of Gomti and Ganga River. Bacteria were isolated by plating on nutrient agar supplemented with individual antibiotics (100 µg/ml) to select the resistant strains. These isolates were subsequently tested for cross-resistance to other antibiotics using the disc diffusion method. PCR was performed to detect selected ARGs.
RESULTS: The enumeration of microbial population of Gomti River, the tetracycline-resistant bacteria comprised 38% of the bacterial population during spring and chloramphenicol resistance during autumn was a mere 11.9%. Nevertheless, erythromycin resistance was widespread amongst Ganga river bacteria during winter by 28%, while ciprofloxacin resistance was seen in autumn with only 15.8%. Bacterial population led to decline due to antibiotic-induced stress. The tetracycline-resistant bacteria were completely resistant to ampicillin and 66.6% were resistant to erythromycin. In Ganga river water, 53.5% of ampicillin-resistant isolates were resistant to erythromycin and sulphadiazine 93.3% were resistant to nalidixic acid. In the Gomti River water, the most common resistance gene among tetracycline resistant isolates was tetM (83.3%), followed by ampC (83.3%) in ampicillin-resistant isolates. In the Ganga River, 66.6% of bacterial isolates were found to have ampC and ermB genes. The sul1 gene was absent in all the bacterial isolates in both water samples.
CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that both rivers act as reservoirs for multidrug-resistant bacteria harbouring complex resistance gene profiles.