The Journal of pediatrics · 1995
Neurodevelopmental status at age five years of neonates treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Glass P, Wagner A E, Papero P H, Rajasingham S R, Civitello L A, Kjaer M S, Coffman C E, Getson P R, Short B L
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine the neurodevelopmental status at age 5 years among children who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the newborn period as a treatment for severe cardiorespiratory failure.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 103 five-year-old ECMO-treated children born between June 1984 and July 1988, and treated at our institution. Thirty-seven healthy control children were recruited locally. The assessment protocol included a complete neuropsychologic assessment, psychosocial assessment with parent questionnaires, a standard neurologic evaluation, assessment of gross motor and fine motor function, a medical history, and physical examination.
RESULTS: Major disability was present in 17 of the ECMO cohort. Eleven ECMO-treated children (11%) were mentally retarded, one of whom was profoundly impaired. Two additional children had severe learning disabilities. Cerebral palsy was diagnosed in 5 (5%) ECMO-treated children, but all cases were mild in nature and the patients were walking unaided. One child has paraplegia. The mean Full Scale, Verbal, and Performance IQs of the EMCO-treated children were within the normal range, but as a group were significantly lower than in control children (96 vs 115, p < 0.001). Children treated with ECMO had increased risk relative to the control children for academic difficulties at school age (49% VS 22%, P < 0.01) and a higher rate of behavioral problems reported by parents (42% vs 16%, p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of major disability was comparable to that in other high-risk populations. The high rate of behavioral problems and increased risk of subsequent school failure among nonretarded ECMO-treated children supports the need for close follow-up of these children after hospital discharge.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 103 five-year-old ECMO-treated children born between June 1984 and July 1988, and treated at our institution. Thirty-seven healthy control children were recruited locally. The assessment protocol included a complete neuropsychologic assessment, psychosocial assessment with parent questionnaires, a standard neurologic evaluation, assessment of gross motor and fine motor function, a medical history, and physical examination.
RESULTS: Major disability was present in 17 of the ECMO cohort. Eleven ECMO-treated children (11%) were mentally retarded, one of whom was profoundly impaired. Two additional children had severe learning disabilities. Cerebral palsy was diagnosed in 5 (5%) ECMO-treated children, but all cases were mild in nature and the patients were walking unaided. One child has paraplegia. The mean Full Scale, Verbal, and Performance IQs of the EMCO-treated children were within the normal range, but as a group were significantly lower than in control children (96 vs 115, p < 0.001). Children treated with ECMO had increased risk relative to the control children for academic difficulties at school age (49% VS 22%, P < 0.01) and a higher rate of behavioral problems reported by parents (42% vs 16%, p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of major disability was comparable to that in other high-risk populations. The high rate of behavioral problems and increased risk of subsequent school failure among nonretarded ECMO-treated children supports the need for close follow-up of these children after hospital discharge.