DOI 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb01747.x
Increasing the recognition of delirium in elderly patients.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To determine if an educational intervention aimed at house staff will increase knowledge about and recognition of delirium.
DESIGN
Before/after study, with blinding of participants to the intent of the study.
SETTING
University hospital in Halifax, Nova Scotia.
PATIENTS: One hundred eighty-seven control patients, seen as consecutive admissions of elderly patients (65 + years) to the General Medicine services of the Victoria General Hospital prior to the educational intervention, and 247 patients seen thereafter.
INTERVENTION: Educational intervention at grand rounds, housestaff rounds, sign-in rounds, and bedside teaching.
MEASUREMENTS: Recognition of delirium in the admitting history or progress notes, Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) as recorded by nurses, diagnosis of delirium by independent study physicians using DSM-IIIR criteria and the Trzepacz Delirium Symptom Rating Scale.
RESULTS
Prior to the intervention, delirium or acute confusion was diagnosed in 3% of patients; after the intervention, delirium or acute confusion was diagnosed in 9% of patients (P < 0.01). Other abnormalities in mental state were noted in 8.5% of admissions prior to the intervention, and 15.6% of admissions after the intervention. After the intervention there was a significant difference in the proportion of patients in whom a mental status questionnaire had been carried out and in whom there was formal comment on various aspects of the mental state. The nursing CAM had a sensitivity of 0.68 and a specificity of 0.97.
CONCLUSIONS
A simple educational intervention aimed at house staff appears to be effective in changing house staff behavior. Improved recognition of delirium may lead to better patient outcomes.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.