Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021
[Partial visual rehabilitation 5 and 6 years after a Gundersen total conjunctival flap procedure].
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Abu Dail Y, Daas L, Flockerzi F A, Seitz B
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We present the results of penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) after previous treatment with a total conjunctival flap in two patients.
CASE REPORTS: Patient 1, a 66-year-old with a history of bilateral cement chemical burn in 1986 and external right-sided limbokeratoplasty in 2008 was treated externally with a total conjunctival flap in the right eye in 2014 due to a persistent corneal ulcer with imminent perforation. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the right eye was light sensation, intraocular pressure on palpation was within normal range. Clinically, total conjunctival flap was present. Patient 2 was treated externally in May 2015 due to acanthamoeba keratitis in the left eye with a deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK). A re-DALK was also performed externally in the same month. A third DALK was performed externally in August 2015 due to a persistent corneal ulcer, followed by a total conjunctival flap 2 weeks later. BCVA of the left eye was light sensation and intraocular pressure on palpation was within the normal range.
RESULTS: Patient 1 was treated with removal of the conjunctival flap in the right eye and penetrating central re-keratoplasty (hand-held Barron trephine; graft diameter 8.5/8.75 mm). Simultaneously, lens extraction and intraocular lens implantation were performed (as a triple procedure). Additionally, amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) as patch and a temporal lateral tarsorrhaphy were performed. BCVA 6 months postoperatively was 0.1. The graft was clear, without any signs of rejection. Patient 2 was treated on the left eye with removal of the conjunctival flap and a penetrating central keratoplasty (hand-held Barron trephine; graft diameter 7.0/7.5 mm). An AMT as patch and a temporal lateral tarsorrhaphy were simultaneously performed. Cataract surgery was performed 3 months postoperatively and BCVA of the right eye was 0.1 thereafter. The graft was clear, without any signs of rejection.
CONCLUSION: The conjunctival flap is a treatment of last resort of the (almost) penetrated corneal ulcer, which is to be used only when a keratoplasty is technically impossible. Provided the eye structure and retinal function are preserved, partial visual rehabilitation can possibly be achieved through a PKP after excision of the conjunctival flap, even years after corneal blindness.
CASE REPORTS: Patient 1, a 66-year-old with a history of bilateral cement chemical burn in 1986 and external right-sided limbokeratoplasty in 2008 was treated externally with a total conjunctival flap in the right eye in 2014 due to a persistent corneal ulcer with imminent perforation. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the right eye was light sensation, intraocular pressure on palpation was within normal range. Clinically, total conjunctival flap was present. Patient 2 was treated externally in May 2015 due to acanthamoeba keratitis in the left eye with a deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK). A re-DALK was also performed externally in the same month. A third DALK was performed externally in August 2015 due to a persistent corneal ulcer, followed by a total conjunctival flap 2 weeks later. BCVA of the left eye was light sensation and intraocular pressure on palpation was within the normal range.
RESULTS: Patient 1 was treated with removal of the conjunctival flap in the right eye and penetrating central re-keratoplasty (hand-held Barron trephine; graft diameter 8.5/8.75 mm). Simultaneously, lens extraction and intraocular lens implantation were performed (as a triple procedure). Additionally, amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) as patch and a temporal lateral tarsorrhaphy were performed. BCVA 6 months postoperatively was 0.1. The graft was clear, without any signs of rejection. Patient 2 was treated on the left eye with removal of the conjunctival flap and a penetrating central keratoplasty (hand-held Barron trephine; graft diameter 7.0/7.5 mm). An AMT as patch and a temporal lateral tarsorrhaphy were simultaneously performed. Cataract surgery was performed 3 months postoperatively and BCVA of the right eye was 0.1 thereafter. The graft was clear, without any signs of rejection.
CONCLUSION: The conjunctival flap is a treatment of last resort of the (almost) penetrated corneal ulcer, which is to be used only when a keratoplasty is technically impossible. Provided the eye structure and retinal function are preserved, partial visual rehabilitation can possibly be achieved through a PKP after excision of the conjunctival flap, even years after corneal blindness.