Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2013
[Ophthalmologic screening history and vision-targeted health status of patients suffering from chloroquine maculopathy].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bergholz R, Rüther K, Tillack H, Joussen A M, Schroeter J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Maculopathy or retinopathy can develop as a side effect of chloroquine intake. Despite recommendations for ophthalmologic screening by the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) severe toxic retinal damage still occurs. This study aims to clarify how maculopathy affects patient quality of life and whether it arises only due to non-compliance with screening guidelines.
METHODS: Patients suffering from chloroquine maculopathy were questioned about the ophthalmologic examinations that took place under therapy and completed a German version of the 25 item visual function questionnaire (VFQ-25).
RESULTS: A total of ten female patients were included in the analysis. Weighted visual acuity ranged from 0.09 to 0.8. Median composite score of the VFQ-25 was 33.9. All patients were periodically screened for ocular toxicity with a median trimestrial screening frequency but five patients did not receive all recommended methods of examination. There was suspicion of retinal damage in only one patient even without the patient reporting complaints. Median time span between onset of visual complaints and the cessation of the drug was 12 months. All patients with complaints reported a continuing deterioration of vision even after cessation.
CONCLUSIONS: Chloroquine maculopathy has a major impact on the vision-related health status of affected patients, emphasizing the need for its anticipation. Although patients were screened even more frequently than recommended by the AAO only half were examined properly and nine out of ten patients had a delay in diagnosis and in drug cessation. The continuing deterioration of vision even after termination of intake further contributes to the severity of the disease.
METHODS: Patients suffering from chloroquine maculopathy were questioned about the ophthalmologic examinations that took place under therapy and completed a German version of the 25 item visual function questionnaire (VFQ-25).
RESULTS: A total of ten female patients were included in the analysis. Weighted visual acuity ranged from 0.09 to 0.8. Median composite score of the VFQ-25 was 33.9. All patients were periodically screened for ocular toxicity with a median trimestrial screening frequency but five patients did not receive all recommended methods of examination. There was suspicion of retinal damage in only one patient even without the patient reporting complaints. Median time span between onset of visual complaints and the cessation of the drug was 12 months. All patients with complaints reported a continuing deterioration of vision even after cessation.
CONCLUSIONS: Chloroquine maculopathy has a major impact on the vision-related health status of affected patients, emphasizing the need for its anticipation. Although patients were screened even more frequently than recommended by the AAO only half were examined properly and nine out of ten patients had a delay in diagnosis and in drug cessation. The continuing deterioration of vision even after termination of intake further contributes to the severity of the disease.