Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2012
Variables associated with corneal confocal microscopy parameters in healthy volunteers: implications for diabetic neuropathy screening.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wu T, Ahmed A, Bril V, Orszag A, Ng E, Nwe P, Perkins B A
Аннотация
AIM: Corneal confocal microscopy is a promising screening method for diabetic neuropathy. Although much research in this field has been accomplished, we aimed to determine and confirm the known clinical and eyewear variables associated with the parameters of corneal confocal microscopy specifically in healthy volunteers, in particular associations with corneal nerve fibre length.
METHODS: Clinical characteristics, electrophysiological examination and a general clinical eye history were collected from 64 healthy volunteers. Corneal confocal microscopy was performed to determine corneal nerve fibre length, corneal nerve branch density, corneal nerve fibre density and tortuosity coefficient. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis was used to determine clinical variables associated with corneal nerve fibre length parameters.
RESULTS: We observed that corneal nerve fibre length has a broad distribution in healthy volunteers (18 ± 4 mm/mm(2), 95% confidence interval, 12.3-25.7 mm/mm(2)). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that HbA(1c) was the only independent clinical factor to account for variations in corneal nerve fibre length, independent of age and status of contact lens wear.
CONCLUSIONS: This study does not provide convincing evidence that corneal nerve fibre length is independently associated with age or the wearing of contact lenses, and that these factors are therefore unlikely to hinder valid screening for polyneuropathies such as diabetic neuropathy. Furthermore, the strong inverse association of corneal nerve fibre length with glycaemic exposure may support the use of this parameter to detect subclinical pre-diabetic nerve injury.
METHODS: Clinical characteristics, electrophysiological examination and a general clinical eye history were collected from 64 healthy volunteers. Corneal confocal microscopy was performed to determine corneal nerve fibre length, corneal nerve branch density, corneal nerve fibre density and tortuosity coefficient. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis was used to determine clinical variables associated with corneal nerve fibre length parameters.
RESULTS: We observed that corneal nerve fibre length has a broad distribution in healthy volunteers (18 ± 4 mm/mm(2), 95% confidence interval, 12.3-25.7 mm/mm(2)). Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that HbA(1c) was the only independent clinical factor to account for variations in corneal nerve fibre length, independent of age and status of contact lens wear.
CONCLUSIONS: This study does not provide convincing evidence that corneal nerve fibre length is independently associated with age or the wearing of contact lenses, and that these factors are therefore unlikely to hinder valid screening for polyneuropathies such as diabetic neuropathy. Furthermore, the strong inverse association of corneal nerve fibre length with glycaemic exposure may support the use of this parameter to detect subclinical pre-diabetic nerve injury.