Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie · 2011
Macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness in adults with amblyopia.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Walker Randy A, Rubab Shehla, Voll Alexandra R L, Erraguntla Vasudha, Murphy Paul H
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate macular and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in amblyopic eyes compared to the fellow eye.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
PARTICIPANTS: 30 patients (60 eyes) older than 18 years of age with amblyopia.
METHODS: Inclusion criteria included individuals older than 18 years, amblyopia, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≤ 20/40. A complete medical history was taken and an eye examination carried out. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was carried out on both eyes of all patients. Exclusion criteria included intraocular pressure (IOP) >23 mm Hg and eye pathology that may affect OCT measurements. The primary outcome measures were foveal thickness and average peripapillary RNFL thickness, which were compared using a paired t test. Quadrants in peripapillary scans and concentric rings in macular scans were analyzed.
RESULTS: The average age was 56 years (range = 33-82 years). Visual acuity ranged from 20/40 to 20/4000 (mean = 20/275). The average peripapillary RNFL thickness was 90.6 μm (SD = 9.6 μm) in the amblyopic eye and 90.1 μm (SD = 12.1 μm) in the fellow eye (p = 0.64). The average macular thickness in amblyopic eyes was 260.1 μm (SD = 32.0 μm), and 254.7 μm (SD = 32.5 μm) in fellow eyes (p = 0.10). No statistical difference existed between peripapillary quadrants or macular concentric rings. These differences were smaller when the strabismic amblyopes were isolated.
CONCLUSIONS: There does not seem to be a difference in peripapillary RNFL or macular thickness between the amblyopic eye and fellow eye.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
PARTICIPANTS: 30 patients (60 eyes) older than 18 years of age with amblyopia.
METHODS: Inclusion criteria included individuals older than 18 years, amblyopia, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≤ 20/40. A complete medical history was taken and an eye examination carried out. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was carried out on both eyes of all patients. Exclusion criteria included intraocular pressure (IOP) >23 mm Hg and eye pathology that may affect OCT measurements. The primary outcome measures were foveal thickness and average peripapillary RNFL thickness, which were compared using a paired t test. Quadrants in peripapillary scans and concentric rings in macular scans were analyzed.
RESULTS: The average age was 56 years (range = 33-82 years). Visual acuity ranged from 20/40 to 20/4000 (mean = 20/275). The average peripapillary RNFL thickness was 90.6 μm (SD = 9.6 μm) in the amblyopic eye and 90.1 μm (SD = 12.1 μm) in the fellow eye (p = 0.64). The average macular thickness in amblyopic eyes was 260.1 μm (SD = 32.0 μm), and 254.7 μm (SD = 32.5 μm) in fellow eyes (p = 0.10). No statistical difference existed between peripapillary quadrants or macular concentric rings. These differences were smaller when the strabismic amblyopes were isolated.
CONCLUSIONS: There does not seem to be a difference in peripapillary RNFL or macular thickness between the amblyopic eye and fellow eye.