MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/archneurol.2009.230

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of neurology · 2009

Macular volume determined by optical coherence tomography as a measure of neuronal loss in multiple sclerosis.

Burkholder Bryn M, Osborne Benjamin, Loguidice Michael J, Bisker Esther, Frohman Teresa C, Conger Amy, Ratchford John N, Warner Christina, Markowitz Clyde E, Jacobs Dina A, Galetta Steven L, Cutter Gary R, Maguire Maureen G, Calabresi Peter A, Balcer Laura J, Frohman Elliot M

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Inner (area adjacent to the fovea) and outer regions of the macula differ with respect to relative thicknesses of the ganglion cell layer (neurons) vs retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL; axons).

OBJECTIVE

To determine how inner vs outer macular volumes relate to peripapillary RNFL thickness and visual function in multiple sclerosis (MS) and to examine how these patterns differ among eyes with vs without a history of acute optic neuritis (ON).

DESIGN

Study using cross-sectional optical coherence tomography.

SETTING

Three academic tertiary care MS centers.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with MS, diagnosed by standard criteria, and disease-free control participants.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Optical coherence tomography was used to measure macular volumes and RNFL thickness. Visual function was assessed using low-contrast letter acuity and high-contrast visual acuity (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study charts).

RESULTS

Among eyes of patients with MS (n = 1058 eyes of 530 patients), reduced macular volumes were associated with peripapillary RNFL thinning; 10-microm differences in RNFL thickness (9.6% of thickness in control participants without disease) corresponded to 0.20-mm(3) reductions in total macular volume (2.9% of volume in control participants without disease, P < .001). This relation was similar for eyes of MS patients with and without a history of ON. Although peripapillary RNFL thinning was more strongly associated with decrements in outer compared with inner macular volumes, correlations with inner macular volume were significant (r = 0.58, P < .001) and of slightly greater magnitude for eyes of MS patients with a history of ON vs eyes of MS patients without a history of ON (r = 0.61 vs r = 0.50). Lower (worse) visual function scores were associated with reduced total, inner, and outer macular volumes. However, accounting for peripapillary RNFL thickness, the relation between vision and inner macular volume remained significant and unchanged in magnitude, suggesting that this region contains retinal structures separate from RNFL axons that are important to vision.

CONCLUSIONS

Analogous to studies of gray matter in MS, these data provide evidence that reductions of volume in the macula (approximately 34% neuronal cells by average thickness) accompany RNFL axonal loss. Peripapillary RNFL thinning and inner macular volume loss are less strongly linked in eyes of MS patients without a history of ON than in eyes of MS patients with a history of ON, suggesting alternative mechanisms for neuronal cell loss. Longitudinal studies with segmentation of retinal layers will further explore the relation and timing of ganglion cell degeneration and RNFL thinning in MS.

Для цитирования: Burkholder Bryn M, Osborne Benjamin, Loguidice Michael J, Bisker Esther, Frohman Teresa C, Conger Amy, Ratchford John N, Warner Christina, Markowitz Clyde E, Jacobs Dina A, Galetta Steven L, Cutter Gary R, Maguire Maureen G, Calabresi Peter A, Balcer Laura J, Frohman Elliot M. Macular volume determined by optical coherence tomography as a measure of neuronal loss in multiple sclerosis.. Archives of neurology. 2009. DOI: 10.1001/archneurol.2009.230.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.