Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie · 2009
Intraocular pressure adjusted for central corneal thickness as a screening tool for open-angle glaucoma in an at-risk population.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
de Saint Sardos A, Kamdeu Fansi A, Chagnon M, Harasymowycz P J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of intraocular pressure (IOP) adjusted for central corneal thickness (CCT) screening for open-angle glaucoma (OAG) in an at-risk population.
STUDY DESIGN: Community-based screening clinic.
PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred and forty-nine persons of black race, or >50 years of age, or with a positive family history of glaucoma.
METHODS: Ophthalmological examination including Goldmann applanation tonometry, ultrasonographic corneal pachymetry, and visual field testing. Glaucomatous optic nerve damage with visual field loss was the gold standard. IOP was adjusted for CCT based on 3 nomograms. Results were compared with screening using unadjusted IOP. Outcome measures included sensitivity, specificity, areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, positive and negative predictive values (PPVs and NPVs), as well as positive and negative likelihood ratios.
RESULTS: No significant difference in CCT was found between those with glaucoma (560 [SD 37] microm, n = 31) and those without (557 [SD 35] microm, n = 233). Screening adjusted IOPs for glaucoma with an IOP > 21 mm Hg resulted in PPVs of 23.8% to 25% and NPVs of 89.3% to 89.6%, similar to preadjustment values. Areas under the ROC curves varied from 0.544 to 0.571 post adjustment from the initial value of 0.574.
CONCLUSIONS: IOP adjusted for CCT is unlikely to improve tonometry as a screening tool for OAG in an at-risk population.
STUDY DESIGN: Community-based screening clinic.
PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred and forty-nine persons of black race, or >50 years of age, or with a positive family history of glaucoma.
METHODS: Ophthalmological examination including Goldmann applanation tonometry, ultrasonographic corneal pachymetry, and visual field testing. Glaucomatous optic nerve damage with visual field loss was the gold standard. IOP was adjusted for CCT based on 3 nomograms. Results were compared with screening using unadjusted IOP. Outcome measures included sensitivity, specificity, areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, positive and negative predictive values (PPVs and NPVs), as well as positive and negative likelihood ratios.
RESULTS: No significant difference in CCT was found between those with glaucoma (560 [SD 37] microm, n = 31) and those without (557 [SD 35] microm, n = 233). Screening adjusted IOPs for glaucoma with an IOP > 21 mm Hg resulted in PPVs of 23.8% to 25% and NPVs of 89.3% to 89.6%, similar to preadjustment values. Areas under the ROC curves varied from 0.544 to 0.571 post adjustment from the initial value of 0.574.
CONCLUSIONS: IOP adjusted for CCT is unlikely to improve tonometry as a screening tool for OAG in an at-risk population.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Black PeopleCanadaCorneaCross-Sectional StudiesFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansIntraocular PressureLikelihood FunctionsMaleMiddle AgedNomogramsOcular HypertensionOptic Nerve DiseasesPredictive Value of TestsROC CurveRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificityTonometry, OcularUltrasonographyVision DisordersVisual FieldsWhite People