Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025
Associations between potential risk factors and blood-brain barrier water permeability in middle-aged and older adults.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tee Mervin, Padrela Beatriz E, Dupeyron Margaux, Huang Jiannan, Low Marcus, Konstandin Simon, Eickel Klaus, Günther Matthias, Minta Karolina, Schinazi Victor R, Colombo Giorgio, Petr Jan, Mutsaerts Henk Jmm, Hilal Saima
Аннотация
Background: Blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction is suggested to be a potential mediator between vascular risk factors and cognitive impairment, leading to vascular cognitive impairment. Objective: To investigate the relationships between age, sex, and vascular risk factors and BBB water permeability as well as their relationship with cognition. Methods: To measure BBB permeability, a novel arterial spin labelling MRI technique (ME-ASL) was applied to derive the time of exchange (Tex), arterial time transit (ATT), and cerebral blood flow (CBF). The association of potential risk factors, such as age, sex, body mass index (BMI), blood pressure (BP), and medical history, with these BBB parameters were assessed in 144 community-dwelling adults (median age 59 years, 57% females). The relationship between BBB permeability and cognitive performance measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was also assessed. Results: We found that increased BMI was significantly associated with decreased CBF (β = -0.06). Systolic BP and diastolic BP showed significant associations with all ASL parameters; systolic BP was negatively correlated with Tex (β = -0.02) and CBF (β = -0.01) but positively with ATT (β = 0.02). Diastolic BP was negatively associated with Tex (β = -0.03) and CBF (β = -0.03) but positively with ATT (β = 0.03). MoCA scores had a borderline significant association with Tex (OR = 1.51) and a significant association with CBF (OR = 1.84), which became non-significant after adjusting for confounders. Conclusions: These outcomes underscore the potential of using ME-ASL, warranting further research to strengthen these findings.