Diagnostic performance of CCTA and CTP imaging for clinically suspected in-stent restenosis: A meta-analysis.

AIMS: The objective of this study is to conduct a meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic performance of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) and a hybrid approach that incorporates Computed Tomography Perfusion (CTP) in addition to CCTA (CCTA ​+ ​CTP) for the detection of in-stent restenosis (ISR), as defined by angiography.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of articles identified 18,513 studies. After removing duplicates, title/abstract screening, and full-text review, 17 CCTA and 3 CCTA ​+ ​CTP studies were included. Only studies using ≥64-slices multidetector computed tomography (CT) were considered eligible.

RESULTS

The per-patient ISR prevalence was 43 ​%, with 92 ​% of stents fully interpretable with CCTA. Meta-analysis exhibited a per-stent CCTA (n ​= ​2674) sensitivity of 90 ​% (95 ​% CI; 84-94 ​%), specificity of 89 ​% (95 ​% CI; 86-92 ​%), positive likelihood ratio of 7.17 (95 ​% CI; 5.24-9.61), negative likelihood ratio of 0.17 (95 ​% CI; 0.10-0.25), and diagnostic odds ratio of 45.7 (95 ​% CI; 22.71-82.43). Additional sensitivity analyses revealed no influence of stent diameter or strut thickness on the diagnostic yield of CCTA. The per-stent diagnostic performance of CCTA ​+ ​CTP (n ​= ​752) did not show differences compared to CCTA.

CONCLUSIONS

With currently utilized scanners, CCTA and CCTA ​+ ​CTP demonstrated high diagnostic performance for in-stent restenosis evaluation. Consequently, a history of previous stent implantation should not be an argument to preclude using these methods in clinically suspected patients.