Cardiovascular ultrasound · 2024
Left atrial function during exercise stress echocardiography as a sign of paroxysmal/persistent atrial fibrillation.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zagatina Angela, Ciampi Quirino, Peteiro Jesus Vazquez, Kalinina Elena, Begidova Irina, Padang Ratnasari, Boshchenko Alla, Merli Elisa, Lisi Matteo, Rodriguez-Zanella Hugo, Kobal Sergio, Agoston Gergely, Varga Albert, Wierzbowska-Drabik Karina, Kasprzak Jarosław D, Arbucci Rosina, Zhuravleva Olga, Čelutkienė Jelena, Lowenstein Jorge, Ratanasit Nithima Chaowalit, Colonna Paolo, Carerj Scipione, Pepi Mauro, Pellikka Patricia A, Picano Eugenio, Stress Echo 2030 study group
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Atrial cardiomyopathy is closely associated with atrial fibrillation (AF), and some patients exhibit no dysfunction at rest but demonstrate evident changes in left atrial (LA) function and LA volume during exercise. This study aimed to identify distinguishing signs during exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) among patients in sinus rhythm (SR), with and without history of paroxysmal/persistent AF (PAF).
METHODS: A prospective cohort of 1055 patients in SR was enrolled across 12 centers. The main study cohort was divided into two groups: the modeling group (n = 513) and the verification group (n = 542). All patients underwent ESE, which included B-lines, LA volume index (LAVi), and LA strain of the reservoir phase (LASr).
RESULTS: Age, resting and stress LAVi and LASr, and B-lines were identified as a combination of detectors for PAF in both groups. In the entire cohort, aside from resting and stress LAVi and LASr, additional parameters differentiating PAF and non-PAF patients were the presence of systemic hypertension, exercise E/e' > 7, worse right ventricle (RV) contraction during exercise (∆ tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion < 5 mm), a lower left ventricular contractile reserve (< 1.6), and a reduced chronotropic reserve (heart rate reserve < 1.64). The composite score, summing all 9 items, yielded a score of > 4 as the best sensitivity (79%) and specificity (65%).
CONCLUSION: ESE can complement rest echocardiography in the identification of previous PAF in patients with SR through the evaluation of LA functional reservoir and volume reserve, LV chronotropic, diastolic, and systolic reserve, and RV contractile reserve.
METHODS: A prospective cohort of 1055 patients in SR was enrolled across 12 centers. The main study cohort was divided into two groups: the modeling group (n = 513) and the verification group (n = 542). All patients underwent ESE, which included B-lines, LA volume index (LAVi), and LA strain of the reservoir phase (LASr).
RESULTS: Age, resting and stress LAVi and LASr, and B-lines were identified as a combination of detectors for PAF in both groups. In the entire cohort, aside from resting and stress LAVi and LASr, additional parameters differentiating PAF and non-PAF patients were the presence of systemic hypertension, exercise E/e' > 7, worse right ventricle (RV) contraction during exercise (∆ tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion < 5 mm), a lower left ventricular contractile reserve (< 1.6), and a reduced chronotropic reserve (heart rate reserve < 1.64). The composite score, summing all 9 items, yielded a score of > 4 as the best sensitivity (79%) and specificity (65%).
CONCLUSION: ESE can complement rest echocardiography in the identification of previous PAF in patients with SR through the evaluation of LA functional reservoir and volume reserve, LV chronotropic, diastolic, and systolic reserve, and RV contractile reserve.