Differences in Progression to Obstructive Lesions per High-Risk Plaque Features and Plaque Volumes With CCTA.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Sang-Eun, Sung Ji Min, Andreini Daniele, Al-Mallah Mouaz H, Budoff Matthew J, Cademartiri Filippo, Chinnaiyan Kavitha, Choi Jung Hyun, Chun Eun Ju, Conte Edoardo, Gottlieb Ilan, Hadamitzky Martin, Kim Yong Jin, Lee Byoung Kwon, Leipsic Jonathon A, Maffei Erica, Marques Hugo, de Araújo Gonçalves Pedro, Pontone Gianluca, Raff Gilbert L, Shin Sanghoon, Stone Peter H, Samady Habib, Virmani Renu, Narula Jagat, Berman Daniel S, Shaw Leslee J, Bax Jeroen J, Lin Fay Y, Min James K, Chang Hyuk-Jae
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: It is still debatable whether HRP simply represents a certain phase during the natural history of coronary atherosclerotic plaques or if disease progression would differ according to the presence of HRP.
METHODS: Patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease, defined as percent diameter stenosis (%DS) <50%, were enrolled from a prospective, multinational registry of consecutive patients who underwent serial coronary computed tomography angiography at an interscan interval of ≥2 years. HRP was defined as lesions with ≥2 features of positive remodeling, spotty calcification, or low-attenuation plaque. Quantitative total and compositional percent atheroma volume (PAV) at baseline and annualized PAV change were compared between non-HRP and HRP lesions.
RESULTS: A total of 3,049 nonobstructive lesions were identified from 1,297 patients (mean age 60.3 ± 9.3 years; 56.8% men). There were 2,624 non-HRP and 425 HRP lesions. HRP lesions had a greater total PAV and all noncalcified components of PAV and %DS at baseline compared with non-HRP lesions. However, the annualized total PAV changes were greater in non-HRP lesions than in HRP lesions. On multivariate analysis adjusted for clinical risk factors, drug use, change in lipid level, total PAV, %DS, and HRP, only the baseline total PAV and %DS independently predicted the development of obstructive lesions (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02 to 1.07, and HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.10, respectively, all p < 0.05), whereas the presence of HRP did not (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of individual coronary atherosclerotic plaque progression differed according to the presence of HRP. Baseline PAV, not the presence of HRP features, was the most important predictor of lesions developing into obstructive lesions. (Progression of Atherosclerotic Plaque Determined By Computed Tomographic Angiography Imaging [PARADIGM]; NCT02803411).