Clinical neurology and neurosurgery · 2019
Cavernous carotid artery aneurysms on a single institution: An epidemiological study with 201 patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Junior Jefferson Rosi, Oliveira Louise Makarem, Boechat Antonio Luiz, Teixeira Manoel Jacobsen, Figueiredo Eberval Gadelha
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Cavernous carotid aneurysms (CCA) represent 2-9% of all intracranial aneurysms. For long considered benign lesions, these entities are unique when it comes to clinical presentation and management. Usually asymptomatic, CCAs can grow and rupture causing different manifestations. The lack of a long-term assessment of both treated and untreated CCAs' natural history justifies why there is no consensus regarding what are the recommended therapeutic measures. While some advocate that an intervention is always necessary, others consider that patients deserve an individualized evaluation.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We describe our single-institution experience in diagnosis, follow-up, and management of 201 CCAs. In addition, we evaluate the association of giant CCAs with aneurysms in other locations using a Chi-square test.
RESULTS: 201 patients had 245 CCAs. 92% of the patients were women. The mean age at diagnosis was 61 years. Concomitant aneurysms were observed in 53.2% of the patients, and the middle cerebral artery was the most affected artery. 66 (30.6%) CCAs were considered "giant", and the follow-up period ranged from 1 to 23 years.The presence of a giant CCA seemed to hinder other aneurysms' formation - RR 0.47 (IC 95% 0.31-0.67), p < 0.0001.
CONCLUSIONS: CCAs should be individually assessed. A conservative approach ought to be adopted for asymptomatic and oligosymptomatic lesions. Finally, a multidisciplinary team must evaluate the other situations, in order to define whether the microsurgical or the endovascular treatment is better option. Presence of a giant lesion within the cavernous sinus is associated with less occurrence of other aneurysms.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We describe our single-institution experience in diagnosis, follow-up, and management of 201 CCAs. In addition, we evaluate the association of giant CCAs with aneurysms in other locations using a Chi-square test.
RESULTS: 201 patients had 245 CCAs. 92% of the patients were women. The mean age at diagnosis was 61 years. Concomitant aneurysms were observed in 53.2% of the patients, and the middle cerebral artery was the most affected artery. 66 (30.6%) CCAs were considered "giant", and the follow-up period ranged from 1 to 23 years.The presence of a giant CCA seemed to hinder other aneurysms' formation - RR 0.47 (IC 95% 0.31-0.67), p < 0.0001.
CONCLUSIONS: CCAs should be individually assessed. A conservative approach ought to be adopted for asymptomatic and oligosymptomatic lesions. Finally, a multidisciplinary team must evaluate the other situations, in order to define whether the microsurgical or the endovascular treatment is better option. Presence of a giant lesion within the cavernous sinus is associated with less occurrence of other aneurysms.