m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Medicina intensiva · 2026

Continuous vs intermittent meropenem administration in critically ill patients and renal function. A secondary post-hoc analysis of the MERCY trial.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Baiardo Redaelli Martina, Pontillo Domenico, Toffoletto Fabio, Grechko Andrey, Garofalo Eugenio, Ferrara Barbara, Paternoster Gianluca, Bove Tiziana, Brazzi Luca, Marzaroli Matteo, Cotoia Antonella, Kotani Yuki, Corradi Francesco, Konkayev Aidos, Ananiadou Sofia, Rauch Simon, Lembo Rosalba, Selva Andrea Della, Bradic Nikola, Torrente Sergio, Landoni Giovanni, Zangrillo Alberto, Monti Giacomo, MERCY Study Group collaborators

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE: In septic patients renal function changes are common, potentially affecting antibiotic therapies. Time-dependent antibiotics, administered as continuous infusion, can improve the time above the minimal inhibitory concentration, but the relationship between meropenem administration strategy and renal function remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate such relationship for a composite primary outcome of 28-day mortality and emergence of pandrug (PDR) or extensively drug-resistant (XDR) pathogens. Secondary aims were to investigate the impact of renal function on clinical and microbiological outcomes, regardless of meropenem administration strategy.

DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the MERCY randomized controlled trial (Continuous Infusion versus Intermittent Administration of MERopenem in CriticallY Ill Patients).

SETTING: Thirty-one ICUs in 4 countries.

PATIENTS: MERCY patients with available estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

INTERVENTIONS: Meropenem administration as continuous infusion or intermittent boluses.

MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: eGFR, mortality, PDR/XDR pathogens.

RESULTS: Among MERCY patients, eGFR was available at randomization for 586 patients: 311 had an eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73m2, 181 between 60-129 ml/min/1.73m2, and 94 patients ≥130 ml/min/1.73m2. Meropenem administration strategy did not affect the primary outcome across eGFR categories (p for interaction = 0.60). Considering renal subgroups regardless of randomization arm, patients with eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73m2 had a lower incidence of new XDR/PDR pathogens compared with the normal renal function group (adjusted RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.95, p = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS: Among the MERCY population, there was no benefit from meropenem continuous infusion or intermittent boluses in any renal function subgroup. Having a lower eGFR was associated with a reduced emergence of PDR/XDR pathogens.

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты