American journal of hypertension · 2013
Effects of gender on sympathovagal imbalance, prehypertension status, and cardiovascular risks in first-degree relatives of type 2 diabetics.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pal Gopal K, Adithan Chandrasekaran, Ananthanarayanan Palghat H, Pal Pravati, Nanda Nivedita, Durgadevi Thiyagarajan, Lalitha Venugopal, Syamsunder Avupati N, Dutta Tarun K
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Although cardiovascular (CV) risks are reported in first-degree relatives (FDRs) of type 2 diabetics, effects of gender on sympathovagal imbalance (SVI) and CV risks in these subjects have not been investigated.
METHODS: Body mass index (BMI), blood pressure variability parameters including baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), spectral indices of heart rate variability, autonomic function tests, insulin resistance, lipid profile, inflammatory markers (interleukin 6, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor α) and oxidative stress (OS) marker were measured and analyzed in control group (without family history of diabetes; 65 women, 60 men) and study group (FDRs of type 2 diabetics; 52 women, 49 men) subjects.
RESULTS: BMI, heart rate, blood pressure, rate-pressure product, stroke volume, left-ventricular ejection time, cardiac output, total peripheral resistance, homeostatic model of insulin resistance, lipid profile, inflammatory and OS markers, and ratio of low-frequency to high-frequency power of heart rate variability (LF-HF ratio), a sensitive marker of SVI, were significantly increased, and BRS was significantly decreased in study group men compared with women. SVI was more intense in men and was due to concomitant sympathetic activation and vagal inhibition. There was no SVI in control subjects. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated independent contribution of BMI, homeostatic model of insulin resistance, atherogenic index, inflammatory and OS markers, and BRS to LF-HF ratio. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated significant prediction of prehypertension status and rate-pressure product (markers of CV risk) by LF-HF, which was more prominent in men.
CONCLUSIONS: SVI is more intense in male FDRs of type 2 diabetics, and SVI is associated with increased CV risk due to insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, inflammation, and oxidative stress in these subjects.
METHODS: Body mass index (BMI), blood pressure variability parameters including baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), spectral indices of heart rate variability, autonomic function tests, insulin resistance, lipid profile, inflammatory markers (interleukin 6, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor α) and oxidative stress (OS) marker were measured and analyzed in control group (without family history of diabetes; 65 women, 60 men) and study group (FDRs of type 2 diabetics; 52 women, 49 men) subjects.
RESULTS: BMI, heart rate, blood pressure, rate-pressure product, stroke volume, left-ventricular ejection time, cardiac output, total peripheral resistance, homeostatic model of insulin resistance, lipid profile, inflammatory and OS markers, and ratio of low-frequency to high-frequency power of heart rate variability (LF-HF ratio), a sensitive marker of SVI, were significantly increased, and BRS was significantly decreased in study group men compared with women. SVI was more intense in men and was due to concomitant sympathetic activation and vagal inhibition. There was no SVI in control subjects. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated independent contribution of BMI, homeostatic model of insulin resistance, atherogenic index, inflammatory and OS markers, and BRS to LF-HF ratio. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated significant prediction of prehypertension status and rate-pressure product (markers of CV risk) by LF-HF, which was more prominent in men.
CONCLUSIONS: SVI is more intense in male FDRs of type 2 diabetics, and SVI is associated with increased CV risk due to insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, inflammation, and oxidative stress in these subjects.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultBiomarkersBlood PressureCase-Control StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2DyslipidemiasFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansIndiaInflammationInsulin ResistanceLogistic ModelsMaleMultivariate AnalysisOdds RatioOxidative StressPedigreePhenotypePrehypertensionRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSex FactorsSympathetic Nervous SystemVagus NerveYoung Adult