Thrombosis research · 2011
Echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary arterial pressure in the follow-up of patients with pulmonary embolism.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Otero Remedios, Oribe Mikel, Ballaz Aitor, Jimenez David, Uresandi Fernando, Nauffal Dolores, Conget Francisco, Rodriguez Consolación, Elias Teresa, Jara Luis, Cayuela Aurelio, Blanco Isabel, Barberá Joan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Echocardiography remains a clinically useful screening test for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) in patients with a history of pulmonary embolism (PE). To devise an effective screening strategy, the definition of a high-risk group is necessary.
METHODS: We examined a total of 744 patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) who were enrolled in a Spanish multicenter study. Patients were monitored every 6months during the first two years, and then once a year thereafter. Transthoracic echocardiography was used to screen patients with a clinical suspicion of CTEPH during follow-up. Pulmonary arterial hypertension was defined as an estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PAP)>50mm Hg. The index thromboembolic episode was considered severe if: (a) the patient was immobilized for medical reasons; or (b) systolic blood pressure was less than 90mm Hg; or (c) troponin T values were above the reference range.
RESULTS: The incidence of PAP>50mm Hg at 36months was 8.3% (95% confidence interval=4.6%-14.5%). Statistical analysis showed a highly significant association between a severe index thromboembolic episode and the subsequent detection of PAP>50mm Hg on echocardiography, with high positive likelihood ratio (2.40) and negative predictive value (>0.97).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a severe index thromboembolic episode would constitute a high-risk group for the development of CTEPH. This group of patients should be subjected to a strict follow-up protocol.
METHODS: We examined a total of 744 patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) who were enrolled in a Spanish multicenter study. Patients were monitored every 6months during the first two years, and then once a year thereafter. Transthoracic echocardiography was used to screen patients with a clinical suspicion of CTEPH during follow-up. Pulmonary arterial hypertension was defined as an estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PAP)>50mm Hg. The index thromboembolic episode was considered severe if: (a) the patient was immobilized for medical reasons; or (b) systolic blood pressure was less than 90mm Hg; or (c) troponin T values were above the reference range.
RESULTS: The incidence of PAP>50mm Hg at 36months was 8.3% (95% confidence interval=4.6%-14.5%). Statistical analysis showed a highly significant association between a severe index thromboembolic episode and the subsequent detection of PAP>50mm Hg on echocardiography, with high positive likelihood ratio (2.40) and negative predictive value (>0.97).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a severe index thromboembolic episode would constitute a high-risk group for the development of CTEPH. This group of patients should be subjected to a strict follow-up protocol.