DOI 10.23736/s2724-6051.22.04953-9
Accuracy of the European Association of Urology (EAU) NMIBC 2021 scoring model in predicting progression in a large cohort of HG T1 NMIBC patients treated with BCG.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Recently, the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel updated the prognostic factor risk groups model for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) with the introduction of a new group of patients at very high risk (VHR). Furthermore, three additional clinical risk factors (i.e., age>70 years, multiple papillary tumors; tumor diameter >3 cm) were proposed. However, the new scoring model was created by analyzing data from patients who did not receive BCG intravesical therapy.
METHODS
This is a retrospective multicenter study analyzing data of 920 patients with HGT1 NMIBC that underwent ReTUR e following BCG intravesical therapy. Patients were stratified into risk groups according to the 2021 new EAU NMIBC prognostic factor risk groups model. This study aimed to identify variables related to disease progression in a large cohort of HGT1 NMIBC patients who underwent both Re-TURB and BCG intravesical immunotherapy.
RESULTS
Median follow-up was 51 months (IQR 41-75), according to EAU NMIBC 2021 scoring model 179 (19.5%) patients were at VHR. Progression-free survival at 5 years was 68.2% and 59.9% for the whole sample and the VHR group, respectively. At multivariable regression model size >3 cm, multifocal tumor, concomitant CIS and LVI were identified as independently associated with disease progression.
CONCLUSIONS
Although patients at VHR are more likely to experience disease progression during follow-up, the European Association of Urology (EAU) NMIBC 2021 scoring model appears to be suboptimal in patients who underwent ReTUR and intravesical BCG therapy.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.