Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde · 2009
[Response of retinal vessel diameter to flicker-light in vasospastics compared to healthy controls].
Контролируемое клиническое исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rickenbacher I, Gugleta K, Zawinka C, Schötzau A, Katamay R, Flammer J, Orgül S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Vascular dysregulation is considered to be a risk factor in several ophthalmic diseases. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reaction of retinal vessels to flicker light in otherwise healthy subjects with a vasospastic propensity.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty healthy Caucasians, aged between 18-35 years were recruited for this study and grouped into vasospastics, based on a history of frequent cold hands, even in summer, with concordant findings in nailfold capillary microscopy, or as controls, if such a history was absent. The reaction of the retinal vascular diameter to flicker light was observed in a distance of two to three discs diameters away from the optic nerve head with the retinal vessel analyser. Three phases of flicker light of twenty seconds followed by baseline light phases of eighty seconds were recorded. The maximal vasodilatory amplitude of each flicker phase was determined and the results averaged.
RESULTS: The maximal average dilatory amplitude at the arterial side reached (mean +/- SD) 2.9 +/- 1.7 % and 4.8 +/- 2.6 % of the baseline amplitude respectively in vasospastic subjects and in healthy controls (t = 2.34; p = 0.025). The reaction at the venous side was statistically comparable in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Otherwise healthy, vasospastic subject disclosed an altered reaction of the retinal vasculature to flicker light in this study.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty healthy Caucasians, aged between 18-35 years were recruited for this study and grouped into vasospastics, based on a history of frequent cold hands, even in summer, with concordant findings in nailfold capillary microscopy, or as controls, if such a history was absent. The reaction of the retinal vascular diameter to flicker light was observed in a distance of two to three discs diameters away from the optic nerve head with the retinal vessel analyser. Three phases of flicker light of twenty seconds followed by baseline light phases of eighty seconds were recorded. The maximal vasodilatory amplitude of each flicker phase was determined and the results averaged.
RESULTS: The maximal average dilatory amplitude at the arterial side reached (mean +/- SD) 2.9 +/- 1.7 % and 4.8 +/- 2.6 % of the baseline amplitude respectively in vasospastic subjects and in healthy controls (t = 2.34; p = 0.025). The reaction at the venous side was statistically comparable in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Otherwise healthy, vasospastic subject disclosed an altered reaction of the retinal vasculature to flicker light in this study.