Urology journal · 2021
Comparison of Single Monthly Instillations of Intra-Vesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Maintenance Therapy with Southwest Oncology Group Regimen in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Patients-A Retrospective Analysis In a Single Institute.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lashay Alireza, Taleghani Saeed, Masoumi Navid
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and complication rate of monthly instillations of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) as maintenance therapy in intermediate and high risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) patients with the current standard Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) protocol.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this observational retrospective study, 40 intermediate and high risk NMIBC patients, receiving standard BCG maintenance regimen, were compared with another 40 NMIBC patients, undergoing monthly intra-vesical instillations of BCG with regard to recurrence, progression and major and minor adverse effects.
RESULTS: The two groups were similar in their basic characteristics except for the older age in the monthly instillation group ( 70.95 ± 9.66 years vs. 64 ± 8.8, p = 0.001). Study objectives between the monthly instillation group and the standard group, including recurrence ( 17.5 % vs. 25%, p = 0.34) and progression rate ( 7.5% vs. 10%, p = 0.54) did not show statistically significant difference. Major and minor complication rate also did not show any difference between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: In addition to the currently recommended standard protocol of BCG maintenance therapy, our study shows that the monthly regimen can be recommended in intermediate and high risk NMIBC patients without compromising the efficacy of the treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this observational retrospective study, 40 intermediate and high risk NMIBC patients, receiving standard BCG maintenance regimen, were compared with another 40 NMIBC patients, undergoing monthly intra-vesical instillations of BCG with regard to recurrence, progression and major and minor adverse effects.
RESULTS: The two groups were similar in their basic characteristics except for the older age in the monthly instillation group ( 70.95 ± 9.66 years vs. 64 ± 8.8, p = 0.001). Study objectives between the monthly instillation group and the standard group, including recurrence ( 17.5 % vs. 25%, p = 0.34) and progression rate ( 7.5% vs. 10%, p = 0.54) did not show statistically significant difference. Major and minor complication rate also did not show any difference between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: In addition to the currently recommended standard protocol of BCG maintenance therapy, our study shows that the monthly regimen can be recommended in intermediate and high risk NMIBC patients without compromising the efficacy of the treatment.