The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2024
Breathing pattern changes in response to bronchoconstriction in physically active adults.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dickinson John W, Smyth Carol M E, Winter Samantha L
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether Opto-Electronic Plethysmography (OEP) can distinguish Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction (EIB) breathing patterns by comparing individuals with and without EIB, and between broncho-constriction and recovery. Breathing pattern was quantified in terms of regional contribution, breathing timing, and the phase between chest sub-compartments which indicates the synchronization in movement of the different sub-compartments.
METHODS: Individuals (n = 47) reporting no respiratory symptoms and no history of any respiratory disease or disorder were assumed to have a healthy breathing pattern. Of 38 participants reporting respiratory symptoms during exercise, and/or a previous diagnosis of asthma or EIB, 10 participants had a positive result to the Eucapnic Voluntary Hyperpnea test, defined as a fall of at least 10% in FEV1 from baseline at two consecutive time points and were classified into the EIB group. OEP data was obtained from 89 markers and an 11-camera motion capture system operating at 100 Hz as follows: pre- and post-EVH challenge, and post-inhaler in participants who experienced a bronchoconstriction, and 2) for the healthy group during tidal breathing.
RESULTS: RCpRCa-Phase (upper versus lower ribcage), RCaS-Phase (lower ribcage versus shoulders), and RCpS-Phase (upper ribcage versus shoulders) differed between bronchoconstriction and rest in athletes with EIB and rest in healthy participants (p < 0.05), in all cases indicating greater asynchrony post-bronchoconstriction, and later movement of the abdominal ribcage (RCa) post-bronchoconstriction. RCpS-Phase was different (p < 0.05) between all conditions (rest, post-bronchoconstriction, and post-inhaler) in EIB.
CONCLUSIONS: OEP can characterize and distinguish EIB-associated breathing patterns compared to rest and individuals without EIB at rest.
METHODS: Individuals (n = 47) reporting no respiratory symptoms and no history of any respiratory disease or disorder were assumed to have a healthy breathing pattern. Of 38 participants reporting respiratory symptoms during exercise, and/or a previous diagnosis of asthma or EIB, 10 participants had a positive result to the Eucapnic Voluntary Hyperpnea test, defined as a fall of at least 10% in FEV1 from baseline at two consecutive time points and were classified into the EIB group. OEP data was obtained from 89 markers and an 11-camera motion capture system operating at 100 Hz as follows: pre- and post-EVH challenge, and post-inhaler in participants who experienced a bronchoconstriction, and 2) for the healthy group during tidal breathing.
RESULTS: RCpRCa-Phase (upper versus lower ribcage), RCaS-Phase (lower ribcage versus shoulders), and RCpS-Phase (upper ribcage versus shoulders) differed between bronchoconstriction and rest in athletes with EIB and rest in healthy participants (p < 0.05), in all cases indicating greater asynchrony post-bronchoconstriction, and later movement of the abdominal ribcage (RCa) post-bronchoconstriction. RCpS-Phase was different (p < 0.05) between all conditions (rest, post-bronchoconstriction, and post-inhaler) in EIB.
CONCLUSIONS: OEP can characterize and distinguish EIB-associated breathing patterns compared to rest and individuals without EIB at rest.