The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2016
Characteristics and outcomes of older adults with long-standing versus late-onset asthma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Herscher Michael L, Wisnivesky Juan P, Busse Paula J, Hanania Nicola A, Sheng Tianyun, Wolf Michael S, Federman Alex D
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of age of onset on clinical characteristics and outcomes in a cohort of older patients with long-standing (LSA) and late-onset asthma (LOA).
METHODS: In all, 452 patients 60 years of age and older with persistent asthma were recruited. We defined LOA as asthma developing at age 40 or later and LSA as developing before age 40. We compared airway obstruction as assessed by spirometry, as well as asthma control using the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), quality of life using the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), and asthma-related emergency department visits and hospitalizations among patients with LSA vs. LOA.
RESULTS: Patients with LOA, were less likely to have FEV1 <70% of predicted (23% vs. 40%, p = 0.0002), to have FEV1/FVC<0.7 (27% vs. 38%, p = 0.01), or to have been intubated in the past (5% vs. 14%, p = 0.0007), and were also less likely to report a history of allergic conditions (64% vs 76%, p = 0.007). There was no significant difference in the level of asthma control, quality of life, or health care utilization.
CONCLUSIONS: Older adults with LOA have different clinical and physiological characteristics and outcomes compared to those with LSA. Some of these differences may represent sequelae of longstanding disease, however LOA may also represent a different clinical phenotype that could influence management approaches.
METHODS: In all, 452 patients 60 years of age and older with persistent asthma were recruited. We defined LOA as asthma developing at age 40 or later and LSA as developing before age 40. We compared airway obstruction as assessed by spirometry, as well as asthma control using the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), quality of life using the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), and asthma-related emergency department visits and hospitalizations among patients with LSA vs. LOA.
RESULTS: Patients with LOA, were less likely to have FEV1 <70% of predicted (23% vs. 40%, p = 0.0002), to have FEV1/FVC<0.7 (27% vs. 38%, p = 0.01), or to have been intubated in the past (5% vs. 14%, p = 0.0007), and were also less likely to report a history of allergic conditions (64% vs 76%, p = 0.007). There was no significant difference in the level of asthma control, quality of life, or health care utilization.
CONCLUSIONS: Older adults with LOA have different clinical and physiological characteristics and outcomes compared to those with LSA. Some of these differences may represent sequelae of longstanding disease, however LOA may also represent a different clinical phenotype that could influence management approaches.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Age FactorsAge of OnsetAgedAirway ObstructionAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaBronchodilator AgentsEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHealth ServicesHospitalizationHumansHypersensitivityIntubation, IntratrachealMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedNebulizers and VaporizersQuality of LifeRespiratory Function TestsSocioeconomic Factors