DOI 10.1513/annalsats.201511-761oc
Analysis of Asthma-Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Overlap Syndrome Defined on the Basis of Bronchodilator Response and Degree of Emphysema.
Аннотация
RATIONALE: Despite the increasing recognition of asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome (ACOS) as a clinical entity, it remains poorly characterized due to a lack of agreement on its definition and diagnostic criteria.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study was to use spirometry and computed tomography (CT) to help better define ACOS as well as to classify subjects with ACOS based on Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) letter grade.
METHODS
We analyzed 10,192 subjects enrolled in the COPDGene Study. Subjects were non-Hispanic white or African American current or former smokers aged 45-80 years with at least a 10-pack-year smoking history. Subjects were categorized as having either ACOS with a bronchodilator response or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with emphysema on the basis of spirometry, high-resolution CT, and a history of asthma or hay fever.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
RESULTS
Subjects with ACOS were younger (60.6 vs. 65.9 years old; P < 0.0001), more likely to be African American (26.8% vs. 14.4%; P < 0.0001), had a higher body mass index (29.6 vs. 25.1 kg/m(2); P < 0.0001), and were more likely to be current smokers (50.9% vs. 20.7%; P < 0.0001). The majority of subjects with ACOS were categorized as GOLD grade B. Despite less severe spirometry and CT findings in subjects with ACOS, there was no significant difference in severe or frequent exacerbations.
CONCLUSIONS
Bronchodilator responsiveness and degree of emphysema can help define ACOS. When defined on the basis of bronchodilator responsiveness and degree of emphysema, patients with ACOS represent a unique and high-risk group with distinct clinical features.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.