International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2015
Clinicopathological findings of focal organizing pneumonia: a retrospective study of 37 cases.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Huo Zhen, Feng Ruie, Tian Xinlun, Zhang Haibo, Huo Li, Liu Hongrui
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Focal organizing pneumonia (FOP) is an uncommon disease. The etiology, and in particular the disease's relationship with infection and the incidence of idiopathic FOP, is relatively unknown. The aim of this study is to review clinical, radiological and pathological features of patients with organizing pneumonia (OP) presenting solitary lesions and to analyze possible causes.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 37 surgical lung biopsy or resection cases of pathologically confirmed FOP over a period of 10 years.
RESULTS: Microscopically, 17 cases showed OP with neutrophilic infiltration or abscess, 11 with epithelioid cell granulomas or scattered multinucleated giant cells, 2 with greater eosinophilic infiltration, and the remaining 7 cases met the diagnostic criteria for pathological cryptogenic OP (COP). The 37 cases of FOP included 22 men and 15 women, aged 29-76 years, and 17 cases had a history of smoking. Cough, fever, sputum, chest or back pain and hemoptysis were the main symptoms. Seven cases were asymptomatic. The diameters of the lesions ranged from 0.2-6.0 cm (median, 3.0 cm). Fever (9/30), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein elevation (9/17) and abnormalities in pulmonary function test (8/24) existed in focal secondary OP (FSOP) patients, but these symptoms were rarely observed in focal COP (FCOP) (0/7, 1/7 and 0/7 cases, respectively). However, no statistically significant differences were found between the FSOP and FCOP.
CONCLUSIONS: Histologically, secondary factors exist in the majority of FOP cases. Idiopathic FOP is found in a minority. With respect to secondary FOP, acute infection and granulomatous inflammation are the main causes. Surgical resection alone appears sufficient for the management of FOP.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 37 surgical lung biopsy or resection cases of pathologically confirmed FOP over a period of 10 years.
RESULTS: Microscopically, 17 cases showed OP with neutrophilic infiltration or abscess, 11 with epithelioid cell granulomas or scattered multinucleated giant cells, 2 with greater eosinophilic infiltration, and the remaining 7 cases met the diagnostic criteria for pathological cryptogenic OP (COP). The 37 cases of FOP included 22 men and 15 women, aged 29-76 years, and 17 cases had a history of smoking. Cough, fever, sputum, chest or back pain and hemoptysis were the main symptoms. Seven cases were asymptomatic. The diameters of the lesions ranged from 0.2-6.0 cm (median, 3.0 cm). Fever (9/30), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein elevation (9/17) and abnormalities in pulmonary function test (8/24) existed in focal secondary OP (FSOP) patients, but these symptoms were rarely observed in focal COP (FCOP) (0/7, 1/7 and 0/7 cases, respectively). However, no statistically significant differences were found between the FSOP and FCOP.
CONCLUSIONS: Histologically, secondary factors exist in the majority of FOP cases. Idiopathic FOP is found in a minority. With respect to secondary FOP, acute infection and granulomatous inflammation are the main causes. Surgical resection alone appears sufficient for the management of FOP.