MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.09.004

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2013

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the larynx-a case report.

Do Bao Anh, Varshney Rickul, Zawawi Faisal, Levental Mark, Caglar Derin, Young Jonathan

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is a borderline neoplasm with uncertain malignant potential. It is a rare disease also referred to as an inflammatory pseudotumor, a plasma cell granuloma, and an inflammatory fibrosarcoma. IMT rarely also involves the head and neck region with only 50 cases of laryngeal IMT reported in the literature, and this is the first case with reported magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings.

METHODS

A 37-year-old man with a 1-year history of hoarseness, dysphagia, and fatigue presented with a right vocal fold submucosal mass and was treated conservatively.

RESULTS

The MRI of the neck revealed a mildly spontaneously hyperintense right true vocal fold on GRE images and relative hyperintensity on fat-saturation T2-weighted images. A biopsy of the right-sided submucosal laryngeal mass was performed and the pathologic examination revealed a lesion consistent with an IMT.

CONCLUSION

IMT is a borderline neoplasm with uncertain malignant potential. There are many variants of IMT and its etiology is not truly understood. In general, IMT of the larynx has a benign clinical course with low rates of recurrence.

Для цитирования: Do Bao Anh, Varshney Rickul, Zawawi Faisal, Levental Mark, Caglar Derin, Young Jonathan. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the larynx-a case report.. Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.09.004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.