MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/rct.0b013e3181ae2949

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of computer assisted tomography · 2010

Churg-Strauss syndrome versus chronic eosinophilic pneumonia on high-resolution computed tomographic findings.

Furuiye Masashi, Yoshimura Nobuyuki, Kobayashi Akiko, Tamaoka Meiyo, Miyazaki Yasunari, Ohtani Yoshio, Miyake Shuji, Inase Naohiko, Yoshizawa Yasuyuki

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the high-resolution computed tomographic findings between Churg-Strauss syndrome (CSS) and chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (CEP).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 16 patients with CSS and 34 patients with CEP.

RESULTS

Twelve (35%) of the 34 patients with CEP had a history of asthma. Although the subpleural distribution of ground-glass opacities (GGOs) and consolidation was common both in CSS and CEP, the midzone distribution was more frequent in CSS (44%) than in CEP (12%). Centrilobular nodules within GGOs were significantly more frequent in CSS (56%) than in CEP (18%). In contrast, traction bronchiectasis associated with volume loss was demonstrated more frequently in CEP (74%) than in CSS (25%).

CONCLUSIONS

On high-resolution computed tomography, the presence of the midzone distribution and nodules within GGOs without traction bronchiectasis suggests CSS rather than CEP.

Для цитирования: Furuiye Masashi, Yoshimura Nobuyuki, Kobayashi Akiko, Tamaoka Meiyo, Miyazaki Yasunari, Ohtani Yoshio, Miyake Shuji, Inase Naohiko, Yoshizawa Yasuyuki. Churg-Strauss syndrome versus chronic eosinophilic pneumonia on high-resolution computed tomographic findings.. Journal of computer assisted tomography. 2010. DOI: 10.1097/rct.0b013e3181ae2949.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.