The Laryngoscope · 2003
The accuracy of computed tomography in the diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bhattacharyya Neil, Fried Marvin P
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of paranasal sinus computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective dual cohort study.
METHODS: One hundred seventy-one consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery for CRS were evaluated with CT and staged according to the Lund system. Histopathological findings from sinus specimens were reviewed and graded. A second contemporaneous control group of 130 patients undergoing CT of the sinus regions for other reasons but without a diagnosis of CRS was also staged. Sensitivity, specificity, and the receiver-operator characteristic were determined for the sinus CT in the diagnosis of CRS. Positive and negative predictive values were also computed.
RESULTS: In the disease-positive group of patients with CRS, the mean Lund score was 9.8 (95% confidence interval, 9.0-10.6). The mean inflammatory grade on histopathological study was 2.3 (range, 0-4). For the control group (without disease), the mean Lund score was 4.3 (95% confidence interval, 3.5-5.0). The AUC for the receiver-operator characteristic was 0.802 (P <.001). Selecting a Lund score cut-off value of greater than 2 as abnormal, the sinus CT exhibited sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 41%, respectively. Increasing the cut-off value to 4 changed the sensitivity and specificity to 85% and 59%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The paranasal sinus CT scan exhibits good sensitivity and above-average specificity for the diagnosis of CRS. When added to the history and physical findings, CT may add to the diagnostic accuracy of CRS.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective dual cohort study.
METHODS: One hundred seventy-one consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery for CRS were evaluated with CT and staged according to the Lund system. Histopathological findings from sinus specimens were reviewed and graded. A second contemporaneous control group of 130 patients undergoing CT of the sinus regions for other reasons but without a diagnosis of CRS was also staged. Sensitivity, specificity, and the receiver-operator characteristic were determined for the sinus CT in the diagnosis of CRS. Positive and negative predictive values were also computed.
RESULTS: In the disease-positive group of patients with CRS, the mean Lund score was 9.8 (95% confidence interval, 9.0-10.6). The mean inflammatory grade on histopathological study was 2.3 (range, 0-4). For the control group (without disease), the mean Lund score was 4.3 (95% confidence interval, 3.5-5.0). The AUC for the receiver-operator characteristic was 0.802 (P <.001). Selecting a Lund score cut-off value of greater than 2 as abnormal, the sinus CT exhibited sensitivity and specificity of 94% and 41%, respectively. Increasing the cut-off value to 4 changed the sensitivity and specificity to 85% and 59%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The paranasal sinus CT scan exhibits good sensitivity and above-average specificity for the diagnosis of CRS. When added to the history and physical findings, CT may add to the diagnostic accuracy of CRS.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAge DistributionAgedCase-Control StudiesChronic DiseaseCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParanasal SinusesPredictive Value of TestsPrevalenceProbabilityProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesReference ValuesRhinitisRisk AssessmentSensitivity and SpecificitySeverity of Illness IndexSex DistributionSinusitisTomography, X-Ray Computed