MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00004728-199607000-00018

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of computer assisted tomography · 1996

Tree-in-bud pattern: frequency and significance on thin section CT.

Aquino S L, Gamsu G, Webb W R, Kee S T

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Our goal was to describe those diseases of the airways that manifest the tree-in-bud (TIB) pattern on CT scan and to establish a differential diagnosis for this CT scan finding.

METHOD: We prospectively collected cases with the TIB pattern on CT and reviewed the scans of patients with histories pertaining to small airway disease. CT scans were performed at 1 to 3 mm collimation.

RESULTS

Twenty-six of 27 cases with the TIB pattern had associated bronchiectasis or proximal airway wall thickening. One case with normal proximal airways had an acute aspiration. In addition, we reviewed 141 scans of patients with emphysema, respiratory bronchiolitis (RB), bronchiolitis obliterans (BO), bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia (BOOP), extrinsic allergic alveolitis (EAA), bronchiectasis, bronchitis, and pneumonia. Of the CT scans with bronchiectasis, 25.6% had TIB, and 17.6% of CT scans with acute infectious bronchitis or pneumonia had this pattern. None of the patients with emphysema, BO, BOOP, EAA, or RB had this pattern.

CONCLUSION

The TIB pattern on CT scan is mostly associated with pulmonary infections that commonly involve the large airways. This pattern was present in 17.6% of cases with acute bronchitis or pneumonia and 25.6% of cases with bronchiectasis.

Для цитирования: Aquino S L, Gamsu G, Webb W R, Kee S T. Tree-in-bud pattern: frequency and significance on thin section CT.. Journal of computer assisted tomography. 1996. DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199607000-00018.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.