JAMA network open · 2026
Artificially Sweetened and Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake and Risk of Liver Cancer.
СтатьяResearch Support, N.I.H., IntramuralНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Watling Cody Z, Zhao Longgang, Zhang Xinyuan, Deubler Emily, Gonzalez-Feliciano Amparo G, Graubard Barry I, Petrick Jessica L, Wojt Aika, Butera Gisela, Hofmann Jonathan N, Beane Freeman Laura E, Shrubsole Martha J, Zheng Wei, Sudenga Staci L, Schernhammer Eva, Eliassen A Heather, Mucci Lorelei A, Sesso Howard D, Sinha Rashmi, Loftfield Erikka, Um Caroline Y, McCullough Marjorie L, Jenab Mazda, Zhang Xuehong, McGlynn Katherine A
Аннотация
IMPORTANCE: Artificially sweetened beverages (ASBs) and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) are widely consumed worldwide and have been linked to metabolic disorders, including obesity and type 2 diabetes, which are established risk factors associated with liver cancer. However, prospective evidence examining beverage consumption and liver cancer subtypes remains limited and inconsistent.
OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between ASB and SSB consumption and risk of incident liver cancer overall and by subtype, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this pooled analysis of 11 prospective cohort studies (10 US cohorts and 1 European cohort, comprising adults without a history of cancer at baseline), participants were enrolled across cohorts between 1980 and 2009 and followed up through end-of-study dates ranging from 2000 to 2019. The median (IQR) duration of follow-up was 11.4 (10.8-27.9) to 31.4 (27.6-31.5) years. This analysis was conducted between September 2024 and August 2025. Participants were followed up via linkage to state cancer registries or follow-up surveys for incident liver cancer.
EXPOSURES: Self-reported intake of ASB and SSB assessed at baseline using validated food frequency questionnaires and analyzed per 1-beverage/day increment.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Incident liver cancer overall and by subtype (HCC and ICC) identified through cancer registries or medical record review. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for liver cancer incidence, adjusting for potential confounders, including demographics and lifestyle factors, and weighted-mean meta-analysis of estimates.
RESULTS: A total of 1 518 411 participants (mean [SD] age, 57.8 [10.1] years; 883 832 female [58.2%]) were included in this analysis. During a median (IQR) of 17.8 (12.8-23.5) years of follow-up, 2811 incident liver cancer cases were identified, including 1699 HCC and 444 ICC cases. After multivariable adjustment, ASB intake per 1-beverage/day increase was not associated with liver cancer risk, HCC (10 cohorts), or ICC (6 cohorts). SSB intake per 1-beverage/day increase was not associated with overall liver cancer risk but was associated with increased risk of HCC (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.18; 10 cohorts) and ICC (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.00-1.32; 6 cohorts). There was no evidence of effect modification by diabetes status.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, increased SSB consumption was associated with increased risk of HCC and ICC. There was little evidence that ASB intake was associated with liver cancer risk overall or by subtype.
OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between ASB and SSB consumption and risk of incident liver cancer overall and by subtype, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this pooled analysis of 11 prospective cohort studies (10 US cohorts and 1 European cohort, comprising adults without a history of cancer at baseline), participants were enrolled across cohorts between 1980 and 2009 and followed up through end-of-study dates ranging from 2000 to 2019. The median (IQR) duration of follow-up was 11.4 (10.8-27.9) to 31.4 (27.6-31.5) years. This analysis was conducted between September 2024 and August 2025. Participants were followed up via linkage to state cancer registries or follow-up surveys for incident liver cancer.
EXPOSURES: Self-reported intake of ASB and SSB assessed at baseline using validated food frequency questionnaires and analyzed per 1-beverage/day increment.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Incident liver cancer overall and by subtype (HCC and ICC) identified through cancer registries or medical record review. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for liver cancer incidence, adjusting for potential confounders, including demographics and lifestyle factors, and weighted-mean meta-analysis of estimates.
RESULTS: A total of 1 518 411 participants (mean [SD] age, 57.8 [10.1] years; 883 832 female [58.2%]) were included in this analysis. During a median (IQR) of 17.8 (12.8-23.5) years of follow-up, 2811 incident liver cancer cases were identified, including 1699 HCC and 444 ICC cases. After multivariable adjustment, ASB intake per 1-beverage/day increase was not associated with liver cancer risk, HCC (10 cohorts), or ICC (6 cohorts). SSB intake per 1-beverage/day increase was not associated with overall liver cancer risk but was associated with increased risk of HCC (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.18; 10 cohorts) and ICC (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.00-1.32; 6 cohorts). There was no evidence of effect modification by diabetes status.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, increased SSB consumption was associated with increased risk of HCC and ICC. There was little evidence that ASB intake was associated with liver cancer risk overall or by subtype.