BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026
Development and external validation of a machine learning model for predicting chronic critical illness in ICU patients with acute pancreatitis.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xu Zhikun, Yang Qinhua, Su Yijing, Jiang Yichun, Peng Dongting, Wu Boru, Mo Wenzhong, Chen Zhiming, Huang Jiayang, Jiang Zhongji, Liu Xueyan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: To develop and validate a machine learning (ML) model to assess the risk of chronic critical illness (CCI) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with acute pancreatitis (AP).
METHODS: We utilised two large, publicly available ICU datasets, MIMIC-IV (v3.1) and the eICU Collaborative Research Database (v2.0), as the development cohort for model construction. A single-centre dataset from China (SZICU) was used for external validation. Three feature selection methods-stepwise regression, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), and the Boruta algorithm-were employed. Three ML methods-logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)-were used for model development. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), accuracy, F1 score, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and Brier score, in both internal and external validation.
RESULTS: The incidences of CCI were 7.00%, 9.89%, and 20.09% in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets, respectively. Eight predictors of CCI were identified: calcium level, body temperature, vasopressor use, urine output, Glasgow Coma Scale score, albumin level, haemoglobin level, and a history of cerebrovascular disease. In the internal validation set, the RF model achieved an AUROC of 0.85 (0.77-0.91), an AUPRC of 0.53 (0.39-0.69), and a Brier score of 0.07 (0.05-0.09). In the external validation set, the RF model achieved an AUROC of 0.73 (0.64-0.81), an AUPRC of 0.42 (0.30-0.56), and a Brier score of 0.16 (0.12-0.20). Feature importance analysis revealed that calcium level, body temperature, vasopressor use, and urine output were the most influential predictors of CCI.
CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated an ML model using eight clinical variables to predict CCI risk in ICU patients with AP.
METHODS: We utilised two large, publicly available ICU datasets, MIMIC-IV (v3.1) and the eICU Collaborative Research Database (v2.0), as the development cohort for model construction. A single-centre dataset from China (SZICU) was used for external validation. Three feature selection methods-stepwise regression, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), and the Boruta algorithm-were employed. Three ML methods-logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)-were used for model development. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), accuracy, F1 score, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and Brier score, in both internal and external validation.
RESULTS: The incidences of CCI were 7.00%, 9.89%, and 20.09% in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets, respectively. Eight predictors of CCI were identified: calcium level, body temperature, vasopressor use, urine output, Glasgow Coma Scale score, albumin level, haemoglobin level, and a history of cerebrovascular disease. In the internal validation set, the RF model achieved an AUROC of 0.85 (0.77-0.91), an AUPRC of 0.53 (0.39-0.69), and a Brier score of 0.07 (0.05-0.09). In the external validation set, the RF model achieved an AUROC of 0.73 (0.64-0.81), an AUPRC of 0.42 (0.30-0.56), and a Brier score of 0.16 (0.12-0.20). Feature importance analysis revealed that calcium level, body temperature, vasopressor use, and urine output were the most influential predictors of CCI.
CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated an ML model using eight clinical variables to predict CCI risk in ICU patients with AP.