Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterology · 2025
Five-year effectiveness of either ustekinumab or vedolizumab in 239 patients with Crohn's disease refractory to anti-tumour necrosis factor.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Amiot Aurélien, Kirchgesner Julien, Alric Hadrien, Tréton Xavier, Uzzan Mathieu, Hammoudi Nassim, Allez Matthieu, Bresteau Clément, Bouhnik Yoram, Seksik Philippe, Carbonnel Franck, Meyer Antoine
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: There are still conflicting data about superiority of ustekinumab over vedolizumab in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) who failed anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF).
AIM: To compare the 5-year effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab and vedolizumab in patients with CD who failed anti-TNF in a multicentre retrospective observational cohort.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study including all consecutive patients with CD refractory or intolerant to anti-TNF who initiated either vedolizumab or ustekinumab between May 2014 and August 2018. Steroid-free clinical remission, clinical remission and treatment persistence were assessed at year 2, 3 and 5 with intention-to-treat analysis and propensity scores weighted logistic models.
RESULTS: A total of 239 patients were included, 107 received ustekinumab and 132 vedolizumab. At year 5, ustekinumab was associated with a higher rate of steroid-free clinical remission (41.2% vs 20.5%; odds ratio 2.72 [1.43-5.18]) and treatment persistence (46.8% vs 22.5%; OR 3.03 [1.63-5.63]) than vedolizumab but not the rate of CD-related intestinal surgery. Superiority of ustekinumab was more pronounced in patients with ileal CD, stricturing or penetrating behaviour, and history of intestinal CD-related surgery. Patients treated with ustekinumab, were associated with higher treatment persistence compared to patients treated with vedolizumab with low (p < 0.001) or intermediate (p < 0.001) but not with those with high vedolizumab CDST (p = 0.95).
CONCLUSION: In this study, ustekinumab was associated with higher rate of steroid-free clinical remission and treatment persistence than vedolizumab after 5 years of follow-up, particularly in patients with ileal CD, stricturing or penetrating behaviour and history of CD-related intestinal surgery.
AIM: To compare the 5-year effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab and vedolizumab in patients with CD who failed anti-TNF in a multicentre retrospective observational cohort.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study including all consecutive patients with CD refractory or intolerant to anti-TNF who initiated either vedolizumab or ustekinumab between May 2014 and August 2018. Steroid-free clinical remission, clinical remission and treatment persistence were assessed at year 2, 3 and 5 with intention-to-treat analysis and propensity scores weighted logistic models.
RESULTS: A total of 239 patients were included, 107 received ustekinumab and 132 vedolizumab. At year 5, ustekinumab was associated with a higher rate of steroid-free clinical remission (41.2% vs 20.5%; odds ratio 2.72 [1.43-5.18]) and treatment persistence (46.8% vs 22.5%; OR 3.03 [1.63-5.63]) than vedolizumab but not the rate of CD-related intestinal surgery. Superiority of ustekinumab was more pronounced in patients with ileal CD, stricturing or penetrating behaviour, and history of intestinal CD-related surgery. Patients treated with ustekinumab, were associated with higher treatment persistence compared to patients treated with vedolizumab with low (p < 0.001) or intermediate (p < 0.001) but not with those with high vedolizumab CDST (p = 0.95).
CONCLUSION: In this study, ustekinumab was associated with higher rate of steroid-free clinical remission and treatment persistence than vedolizumab after 5 years of follow-up, particularly in patients with ileal CD, stricturing or penetrating behaviour and history of CD-related intestinal surgery.