DOI 10.1007/s12094-025-04036-3
Lack of association between prior or concurrent malignancies and overall survival in gastroesophageal cancer: evidence from a large European single-center cohort.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
History of malignant disease is a common exclusion criterion in clinical cancer trials, yet data on the impact of cancer survivorship on outcome in gastroesophageal cancer patients are scarce.
METHODS
Retrospective association analyses of self-reported prior or concurrent malignancies with patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, symptoms and overall survival (OS) were performed in 1491 gastroesophageal cancers patients treated between 01/01/2000 and 31/12/2021 at the Medical University of Vienna.
RESULTS
Of 1491 patients 255 (18%) had other primary cancer diagnoses, of which 185 (73%) occurred before, 52 (20%) at the same time as and 18 (7%) both before and at the same time as gastroesophageal cancer diagnosis. 205 (80%) patients had one, 43 (17%) had 2 and 7 (3%) had 3 other malignancies. History of other malignancies was associated with older age (p < 0.0001), squamous cell histology (p = 0.018), less aggressive localized tumor stages (p = 0.037) and fewer acid reflux (p = 0.011). There was neither an association between history of other primary malignancies nor the number of other cancer entities and OS (p = 0.47; p = 0.43).
CONCLUSION
Self-reported history of other malignant diseases is frequent in a real-life European gastroesophageal cancer cohort and was not statistically significantly associated with outcome, but rather with older age and squamous cell histology. Our data emphasize that cancer survivors should not be categorically excluded from clinical cancer trials due to fear of dismal prognosis. Prospective research is warranted to improve eligibility for this subgroup.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.